The person in the story only questioned this to show how rediculous he finds the European position on their flawed (easy to misuse) adoption of softpatents (check the comments on osnews http://osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=7871&limit=no ).
The greens in germany (who the one who questioned the linux migration in Munich belongs to) are against softpatents. Small companies (i.e. anything other than MS) will be hindered by these laws, because of the great flaws in them. The council of ministers of economy namely decided to throw away all amendments the european parliament (the representatives of the people) made that corrected most of these errors. Things like double clicking, a todo list, an undo/redo button, a progress bar and so on are all patented (some by microsoft). The european patent office has some sort of agreement with the american one, making it easy to file a patent in both offices at the same time. All this will be leaving small businesses (like Genesi) with extreme legal overhead even if they are right because someone else got a patent they should not have (oh and, the patent bureau gets paid per patent - and of course they may not have enough time to research them all thoroughly enough before they grant them - draw your own conclusions).
Aside from undemocratically ignoring the europarliament some of the following things happened:
In germany it was assured beforehand that there would be a vote against the softpatents without amendments, but the minister voted for the patents.
In holland it was even worse, minister Brinkhorst first misinformed the dutch parliament - and blamed it on an "error of the typewriter" - then he was recalled by the dutch parliament, but still did not change his vote. Something which would be fatal to someones political career in most other cases. His own party promised before the elections that they were harsly against softpatents, so a deception of the electorate was performed as well. The irony is that the minister displaying this undemocratic behaviour belongs to a party called "Democrats '66".
On MOS...
Well I don't have my own Peg yet because I'm waiting on a G5 to come out
(( Edit: @ Timfonic: Replying here by editing so I won't pollute this thread too much
While most users will do fine with a G4, one of the things I do with computers is running computations under linux that take hours to compute - you need a fast FPU for that and a G4 is simply too slow. ))
But I really like non-bloated software, starting up fast and working fast. I liked the Amiga because of that and will like the Peg because of it. Also, it runs Amiga software
And the computer does not do anything you do not want it to do, you are in full control (unlike win where lots of stuff is happening without your knowledge - like contacting the internet to send information).
[ Edited by azalin on 2004/8/2 15:11 ]