How about SFS?
  • Acolyte of the Butterfly
    Acolyte of the Butterfly
    walkero
    Posts: 102 from 2006/3/1
    Hello to all. I have installed SFS 1.4.5 with every update on MUI and Ambient exists. I'd like to know if there is a way to update SFS. I still have the 1.210 that comes with MorphOS.

    If yes, how this could be done?

    Thank you all for your time.
  • »17.02.08 - 11:15
    Profile Visit Website
  • Acolyte of the Butterfly
    Acolyte of the Butterfly
    Sprocki
    Posts: 128 from 2005/2/23
    From: Berlin - Germany
    MOS > 1.4.5 will do the trick. It shall include an updated version of SFS. It is not recommended to use SFS-68k.
  • »17.02.08 - 13:08
    Profile
  • Acolyte of the Butterfly
    Acolyte of the Butterfly
    walkero
    Posts: 102 from 2006/3/1
    So, we stick with 1.210. Thanks for your support
  • »17.02.08 - 13:16
    Profile Visit Website
  • Acolyte of the Butterfly
    Acolyte of the Butterfly
    Posts: 140 from 2003/9/16
    From: aGas founder M...
    Why isnt recomended the using of 68k filesystems? The handler its only a mere I/O bound after all, right?

    Maybe anyone with more knowledge than me can clarify me this point.
  • »18.02.08 - 00:25
    Profile
  • Moderator
    Golem
    Posts: 766 from 2003/2/28
    From: Denmark
    I don't think that using 68k filesystems is not recommended, PFS3 for example works fine under MorphOS. But when it comes to SFS you need to consider that the current 68k versions are a completely different branch of development from that included with MorphOS.
  • »18.02.08 - 05:10
    Profile Visit Website
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    Wishmaster
    Posts: 342 from 2003/6/29
    SFS-M68K is not recommended, because it is from brain dead Strohmeyer AOS4 fanatic and may cause problems and incompatibilities on MorphOS.
    Pegasos PPC
  • »18.02.08 - 12:13
    Profile
  • Butterfly
    Butterfly
    munk
    Posts: 94 from 2006/3/27
    Quote:

    Wishmaster wrote:
    SFS-M68K is not recommended, because it is from brain dead Strohmeyer AOS4 fanatic and may cause problems and incompatibilities on MorphOS.


    Such blatantly stupid remarks do not belong into a forum! If you don't have anything valuable to add to this thread, please shutup.
  • »19.02.08 - 07:16
    Profile
  • MorphOS Developer
    jacadcaps
    Posts: 2975 from 2003/3/5
    From: Canada
    Strohmeyer's SFS versions are indeed not recommended. Better stick with good old working 68k SFS and the PPC one included with MorphOS.
  • »19.02.08 - 08:00
    Profile Visit Website
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    Solo_Kazuki
    Posts: 182 from 2006/7/24
    From: Universe:Milky...
    Well.. i had some time ago SFS 68k version, and i had some problems, e.g. when i/o access to HD was very intensive, thre was too big processor usage (probably because it's JIT emulation). In short - with SFS 68k You can't get as good transfer as with MOS version. e.g. Robin Hood (at least demo) was much slower because of intensive HD access.
  • »19.02.08 - 13:02
    Profile Visit Website
  • MorphOS Developer
    jacadcaps
    Posts: 2975 from 2003/3/5
    From: Canada
    That's pretty obviouis since 68k is **surprise** emulated.
  • »19.02.08 - 13:29
    Profile Visit Website
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    Solo_Kazuki
    Posts: 182 from 2006/7/24
    From: Universe:Milky...
    As You can see in this thread, it isn't obvious for everyone... ;)
  • »20.02.08 - 16:34
    Profile Visit Website
  • Paladin of the Pegasos
    Paladin of the Pegasos
    Jupp3
    Posts: 1193 from 2003/2/24
    From: Helsinki, Finland
    Emulated, unofficial branch with no guarantee for compatibility with the official branch (now or in the future)

    That should be enough to convince people to avoid it.

    Also remember that "bigger version number" doesn't always mean "has significant bugfixes and/or new features". And when comparing two totally separate branches, you really can't compare different releases only by their version numbers.

    [ Edited by Jupp3 on 2008/2/22 11:01 ]
  • »22.02.08 - 08:39
    Profile Visit Website