What has happened to the native ScummVM MorphOS port?
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Posts: 979 from 2003/6/28
    It seems that tomjoad is very busy with his work, I was sended him a private message but he doesn't replied, if you see this please reply in PM or here. About if there are others interested on maintain the MorphOS backend of ScummVM, could be nice that, and if tomjoad collabores too will be better, less work for each one...




    Topic fixed to look like english language ;-)
    [ Edited by hooligan on 2004/10/28 23:08 ]
  • »28.10.04 - 19:39
    Profile
  • Paladin of the Pegasos
    Paladin of the Pegasos
    Jupp3
    Posts: 1193 from 2003/2/24
    From: Helsinki, Finland
    Do you have some problems with "the other" ScummVM port?

    Works here...
  • »28.10.04 - 23:32
    Profile Visit Website
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Posts: 979 from 2003/6/28
    I mean the native one, that uses cgx5 instead of SDL, backend/morphos in ScummVM by tomjoad. latest ScummVM is 0.6.1 and tomjoad port is 0.5.1, but the most important thing is that someone maintain the MorphOS backend. SDL port is slower and buggy (on my system).
  • »29.10.04 - 05:37
    Profile
  • Paladin of the Pegasos
    Paladin of the Pegasos
    Jupp3
    Posts: 1193 from 2003/2/24
    From: Helsinki, Finland
    Quote:

    I mean the native one, that uses cgx5 instead of SDL

    But doesn't SDL use cgx5? :-)
  • »29.10.04 - 11:25
    Profile Visit Website
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Posts: 979 from 2003/6/28
    SDL port is a lot slow compared with native port. Native port it seems be less buggy.
  • »29.10.04 - 11:28
    Profile
  • Moderator
    Golem
    Posts: 766 from 2003/2/28
    From: Denmark
    @timofonic

    Maybe you didn't notice it, but your endless posts on this subject don't seem to achieve much. Perhaps it is time to consider a different course of action?
  • »29.10.04 - 13:24
    Profile Visit Website
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    serge
    Posts: 725 from 2003/2/20
    Quote:


    timofonic wrote:
    SDL port is a lot slow compared with native port. Native port it seems be less buggy.


    Hi timofonic,
    Where can we found the native versions please?
  • »29.10.04 - 13:49
    Profile
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Posts: 979 from 2003/6/28
    @serge

    http://www.muenster.de/~tomjoad/scummvm.html
  • »29.10.04 - 19:33
    Profile
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Posts: 979 from 2003/6/28
    @Golem

    This post isn't a "port this" thread, it's because the maintainer of the MorphOS backend seems abandonated it (maybe temporary), so I just ask if someone want to update it maintaining the done work, that's all. I like that tomjoad continue maintainin the MorphOS backend of ScummVM, only doing a public thread for if he see it and others, because he doesn't reply to my private messages, he seems very occupied, let's see if someone continue his work (maybe temporary). Not "port thread, is a "continue thread".
  • »29.10.04 - 23:56
    Profile
  • Just looking around
    Kaminari
    Posts: 4 from 2003/6/5
    From: Paris, France
    If I'm not mistaken, the current maintainer of the MorphOS port is Fabien Coeurjoly.

    [ Edited by Kaminari on 2004/11/10 0:42 ]
  • »09.11.04 - 23:39
    Profile Visit Website
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Posts: 979 from 2003/6/28
    No, it is a fast SDL port, but it seems slow and buggy :-(
  • »10.11.04 - 05:32
    Profile
  • Fab
  • MorphOS Developer
    Fab
    Posts: 1331 from 2003/6/16
    It's fast but it's slow ? :)

    mmh, what bugs did you encounter ? I'm aware of only one issue, with scalers, requiring 24 bits screenmode. But it's far more stable than the native version that had serious issues with the timer code.
    I guess the bugs you encountered are related to an old version of powersdl.
  • »10.11.04 - 09:32
    Profile Visit Website
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Posts: 979 from 2003/6/28
    The last time I was probed, I encountered problems with the dig, wrong colours...

    A fast made port, only modify a few things and compile for use SDL.

    About slow, because the native port is faster, use less processor power.
  • »10.11.04 - 10:17
    Profile
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Stevo
    Posts: 889 from 2004/1/24
    From: #AmigaZeux
    Hehe, why bother: The Dig must be one of the worst LucasArts
    adventures ever (well, apart from the music, but hey, you don't play
    an adventure for the music anyway) :-P
    ---
    http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/logs/its_only_football.txt
  • »10.11.04 - 10:45
    Profile
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Posts: 979 from 2003/6/28
    @Stevo

    You sucks, is a good graphic adventure game :-/

    Why do you said that?
  • »10.11.04 - 11:04
    Profile
  • Moderator
    hooligan
    Posts: 1948 from 2003/2/23
    From: Lahti, Finland
    yeah stevo, you sucks :lol:
    www.mikseri.net/hooligan <- Free music
  • »10.11.04 - 11:40
    Profile Visit Website
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Stevo
    Posts: 889 from 2004/1/24
    From: #AmigaZeux
    @Timo

    I must admit; I really didn't want to bother writing a reply, but
    sinds talking to the mentally unstable is my work, I'll be so kind to
    share you my OPINION of the game:

    For me, this game follows the explorations of three overtly
    stereotypical characters through unimaginative, predicatble plot
    twists. The dialogs are just as stereotypical and while the game tries
    to take itself seriously, it feels like watching and playing a flawed
    b-movie. Also, I found the the puzzles inordinately difficult; some
    being illogical, while others just call for trial and error; just a
    handfull called for logic. In comparison with other lucasarts
    adventures, ranging from the Monkey Island series to a Day of the
    Tentacle or a Full Throttle, The Dig is fatally flawed.

    But hey, that's just my OPINION, you filthy-mouthed oik!
    ---
    http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/logs/its_only_football.txt
  • »10.11.04 - 11:42
    Profile
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    Bladerunner
    Posts: 418 from 2004/2/19
    Fab:
    IRC I wrote you a bugreport a while ago, but i am not sure whether the wrong colours was just a scaler Problem, happend also during screen switches. Anyway just want to add, that i really would like to have the tooltypes again from tomjoads Version :-) (I d´ like to use my scumm bubbles again, without making a script)

    Oh and is there a way to speed up mpeg a bit? (Cutscenes in broken sword is slow as hell on my Peg 1)

    BTW did you compile the cvs Version? Afaik it has now support for Inherrit the Earth (Erben der Erde) one of my favourite adventures, do you know if the Amiga Version (mod files) is also supported?

    Hennes:
    Nice Skin, who made it? Why isn`t it available? ;-)

    Stevo:
    *hehe* IRC we had this Discussion allready? ;-)
    And no, you don`t suck, you have all the right for your opinion, even if it diverts from others..
    (There are even people who don´t like Beats of Rage... ;D )
  • »10.11.04 - 12:56
    Profile
  • Fab
  • MorphOS Developer
    Fab
    Posts: 1331 from 2003/6/16
    Quote:

    IRC I wrote you a bugreport a while ago, but i am not sure whether the wrong colours was just a scaler Problem, happend also during screen switches.
    Anyway just want to add, that i really would like to have the tooltypes again from tomjoads Version (I d´ like to use my scumm bubbles again, without making a script)


    About wrong colors, this is probably an old bug of powersdl, and a new version should cure that.

    Tooltypes, yes, i think about them, don't worry.

    About mpeg playback, i'm quite surprised. it ran quite well on my peg1, just a few framedrops from times to times.

    [ Edited by Fab on 2004/11/10 16:18 ]

    [ Edited by Fab on 2004/11/10 16:20 ]
  • »10.11.04 - 16:17
    Profile Visit Website
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Posts: 979 from 2003/6/28
    I was liked a lot the native port because the current SDL library (even the latest) is still very slow using it conparing to the same program using cgx5, still it needs be heavily optimized I think. The tooltypes thing of the the tomjoad port are really very good feature. Fab, not interested on try to maintain the native port?
  • »11.11.04 - 12:31
    Profile
  • Fab
  • MorphOS Developer
    Fab
    Posts: 1331 from 2003/6/16
    "sdl much slower than native cgx5" is a legend you know. In fact in a window mode, it would be quite difficult to make it much faster. In fullscreen, it maybe be possible to gain 50-75% speed in the blit phase. But you know, the blit part is only a fraction of the whole process. So in the end, with a native port, you may gain 10-15% speed. I don't know if it's worth the effort, considering it already works well on a Peg1 (well except maybe libmpeg2 stuff).
  • »11.11.04 - 12:54
    Profile Visit Website
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Posts: 979 from 2003/6/28
    Uhm, I was seen very fast the tomjoad port, did you tried and compared in power consuming?

    Maybe the mpeg2 decompression is the thing must be optimized?
  • »11.11.04 - 13:40
    Profile
  • Fab
  • MorphOS Developer
    Fab
    Posts: 1331 from 2003/6/16
    I just made a comparison, on day of the tentacle:
    during a scroll, 0.5.1 eats 25-30% cpu on my G4.
    0.6.1 (sdl version), eats exactly the same amount. On a static screen sdl version uses 5% while natie version uses 8%.

    With monkey island 2, 0.5.1 eats 12% cpu while 0.6.1 eats 20% on a static screen. Both use 30% while scrolling.


    So you see, SDL is not *much* slower. If you know a game where the difference is more important, please tell me. and don't forget 0.6.1 is more recent and may be slower than a 0.5.1 version, even if native.
  • »11.11.04 - 14:07
    Profile Visit Website