ixemul.library 50.17
  • Just looking around
    kasbah
    Posts: 5 from 2009/10/17
    On sourceforge you find some older and newer versions, but not 50.17 exactly.

    But why do you need a specific version in favor to the latest version anyway?
  • »16.08.16 - 22:08
    Profile Visit Website
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    polluks
    Posts: 261 from 2007/10/23
    From: Gelsenkirchen,...
    Easy: It's part of the 3.9 ISO.
    ixemul.library 50.17 [notrap, 604e, morphos] (18.03.16)


    [ Editiert durch polluks 17.08.2016 - 18:19 ]
    Pegasos II G4: MorphOS 3.9, Zalman M220W
    Power Mac G3: OSX 10.3 · PowerBook 5,8: OSX 10.5, MorphOS 3.9
  • »16.08.16 - 22:59
    Profile
  • MorphOS Developer
    cyfm
    Posts: 368 from 2003/4/11
    From: Germany
    You might find it in the latest MorphOS 3.10 SDK
  • »16.08.16 - 23:40
    Profile Visit Website
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    polluks
    Posts: 261 from 2007/10/23
    From: Gelsenkirchen,...
    Well, it's my fault. I didn't know the SDK will silently upgrade my system :-(
    Pegasos II G4: MorphOS 3.9, Zalman M220W
    Power Mac G3: OSX 10.3 · PowerBook 5,8: OSX 10.5, MorphOS 3.9
  • »17.08.16 - 15:19
    Profile
  • MorphOS Developer
    cyfm
    Posts: 368 from 2003/4/11
    From: Germany
    Quote:

    Papiosaur schrieb:
    Thanks a lot cyfm!

    It will be possible to add on MorphOS 3.10 please ? Maybe it already into the ISO :-D

    [ Edité par Papiosaur 17.08.2016 - 09:06 ]


    Of course it will be part of the next MorphOS 3.10 update but it also was a requirement for some tools in the already released SDK.
  • »17.08.16 - 19:27
    Profile Visit Website
  • MorphOS Developer
    jacadcaps
    Posts: 1462 from 2003/3/5
    From: Canada
    Quote:

    polluks wrote:
    Well, it's my fault. I didn't know the SDK will silently upgrade my system :-(


    Read the release notes next time :) There's a big fat warning about ixemul there.
  • »17.08.16 - 19:30
    Profile Visit Website
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    polluks
    Posts: 261 from 2007/10/23
    From: Gelsenkirchen,...
    Quote:

    jacadcaps schrieb:
    Quote:

    polluks wrote:
    Well, it's my fault. I didn't know the SDK will silently upgrade my system :-(


    Read the release notes next time :) There's a big fat warning about ixemul there.


    Indeed, I found the warning. Maybe the installer should show it before copying to MOSSYS:Libs/?
    Best would be to have a fallback to 50.10. I know, it's more work for you but makes life easier for us :-)
    Pegasos II G4: MorphOS 3.9, Zalman M220W
    Power Mac G3: OSX 10.3 · PowerBook 5,8: OSX 10.5, MorphOS 3.9
  • »18.08.16 - 14:35
    Profile
  • MorphOS Developer
    CISC
    Posts: 606 from 2005/8/27
    From: the land with ...
    Quote:

    polluks wrote:
    Best would be to have a fallback to 50.10. I know, it's more work for you but makes life easier for us :-)



    Not possible, the reason it requires such specific versions is because there has been internal (either new functionality or critical fixes) changes to the library. However if you as a developer know what you are doing it's still possible to link with older startup code so that latest ixemul isn't required.


    - CISC
  • »18.08.16 - 15:29
    Profile
  • MorphOS Developer
    jacadcaps
    Posts: 1462 from 2003/3/5
    From: Canada
    The SDK itself requires an up-to-date ixemul and usually relies on bugfixes in said library, so SDK updating the libs is a must, sorry.

    If you really need to pass ixemul builds around, bundle the shared library as well. I would strongly encourage to aim for libnix ports though.
  • »18.08.16 - 15:33
    Profile Visit Website
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    polluks
    Posts: 261 from 2007/10/23
    From: Gelsenkirchen,...
    Quote:

    jacadcaps schrieb:
    The SDK itself requires an up-to-date ixemul and usually relies on bugfixes in said library, so SDK updating the libs is a must, sorry.

    If you really need to pass ixemul builds around, bundle the shared library as well. I would strongly encourage to aim for libnix ports though.


    I see.

    Your last statement reminds me of Geit.
    I told him: The keylargo.resource is buggy, it's impossible to type fast.
    He said: It's (maybe) a hardware limitation of the matrix.
    Me again: It works flawlessly with OSX.
    He again: I use an external keyboard.


    [ Editiert durch polluks 18.08.2016 - 20:51 ]
    Pegasos II G4: MorphOS 3.9, Zalman M220W
    Power Mac G3: OSX 10.3 · PowerBook 5,8: OSX 10.5, MorphOS 3.9
  • »18.08.16 - 16:40
    Profile
  • MorphOS Developer
    jacadcaps
    Posts: 1462 from 2003/3/5
    From: Canada
    Updating the SDK is a very time consuming process. Having to deal with multiple ixemul.library versions would mean almost doubling the work.

    I have no idea why you would be talking to Geit about keylargo :)
  • »18.08.16 - 16:58
    Profile Visit Website
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    polluks
    Posts: 261 from 2007/10/23
    From: Gelsenkirchen,...
    Okay, I have the source, so I could even support you!

    Maybe I was feeling a bit frustrated about Geit ;-)
    Pegasos II G4: MorphOS 3.9, Zalman M220W
    Power Mac G3: OSX 10.3 · PowerBook 5,8: OSX 10.5, MorphOS 3.9
  • »18.08.16 - 17:19
    Profile
  • MorphOS Developer
    geit
    Posts: 880 from 2004/9/23
    @polluks

    Funny that "Mr. one word bug report" talks about frustration. :D


    PS. I for sure said "Maybe it is a limitation ...".
  • »18.08.16 - 17:42
    Profile
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    polluks
    Posts: 261 from 2007/10/23
    From: Gelsenkirchen,...
    Quote:

    geit schrieb:
    @polluks

    Funny that "Mr. one word bug report" talks about frustration. :D


    PS. I for sure said "Maybe it is a limitation ...".



    It's not your fault, you simply didn't hid5de (<< the bug) fast enough at geit@home :-D
    BTW #2963 has a few more words.
    Pegasos II G4: MorphOS 3.9, Zalman M220W
    Power Mac G3: OSX 10.3 · PowerBook 5,8: OSX 10.5, MorphOS 3.9
  • »18.08.16 - 17:58
    Profile
  • Cocoon
    Cocoon
    Georg
    Posts: 47 from 2004/4/7
    Quote:

    jacadcaps wrote:

    I would strongly encourage to aim for libnix ports though.


    Why not build the SDK tools without ixemul as well?
  • »19.08.16 - 07:30
    Profile
  • MorphOS Developer
    jacadcaps
    Posts: 1462 from 2003/3/5
    From: Canada
    Quote:

    Georg wrote:
    Why not build the SDK tools without ixemul as well?



    That'd open up a different can of worms :) ixemul has case sensitive paths, libnix does not. That'd make it hard to ensure everything cross compiles for example. I have two requirements for the SDK - it has to be able to build MorphOS and it has to be able to build itself (under MorphOS). I have serious doubts that'd be possible with libnix.
  • »19.08.16 - 14:17
    Profile Visit Website
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    Cool_amigaN
    Posts: 432 from 2011/11/30
    @Papiosaur

    Is it possible to upload the said library at morphos storage, or is it prohibited? Even with a notice that it might screw thing up if installed. It is needed for an increased set of proggies and I would rather not download the complete SDK just for a couple of kbs space.
    Amiga gaming Tribute: Watch, rate, comment :)
  • »10.04.17 - 15:51
    Profile Visit Website
  • MorphOS Developer
    jacadcaps
    Posts: 1462 from 2003/3/5
    From: Canada
    Quote:

    Cool_amigaN wrote:
    @Papiosaur

    Is it possible to upload the said library at morphos storage, or is it prohibited? Even with a notice that it might screw thing up if installed. It is needed for an increased set of proggies and I would rather not download the complete SDK just for a couple of kbs space.


    What set?
  • »10.04.17 - 16:12
    Profile Visit Website
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 8984 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    >> It is needed for an increased set of proggies

    > What set?

    The set consisting at least of the elements mentioned in comment #4 and the one there ;-)
  • »10.04.17 - 21:27
    Profile