Hello all,


where i can found this library please ?

thanks

On sourceforge you find some older and newer versions, but not 50.17 exactly.

But why do you need a specific version in favor to the latest version anyway?

Easy: It's part of the 3.9 ISO.
ixemul.library 50.17 [notrap, 604e, morphos] (18.03.16)


[ Editiert durch polluks 17.08.2016 - 18:19 ]

@kasbah

some MorphOS soft as Lazymines and Hercules emulator ask me this version of ixemul...

@polluks,

3.9 or 3.10 ?

I have ixemul.library 50.10 in ISO 3.9 here...

You might find it in the latest MorphOS 3.10 SDK

Thanks a lot cyfm!

It will be possible to add on MorphOS 3.10 please ? Maybe it already into the ISO

[ Edité par Papiosaur 17.08.2016 - 09:06 ]

@cyfm: sorry, i don't found it on the last SDK...

@cyfm: ok, i have installed the last SDK and the installer seems to install ixemul.library 50.17 to MOSSYS:Libs/

Lazymines and Hercules works now!

Thanks cyfm

Well, it's my fault. I didn't know the SDK will silently upgrade my system

No problem polluks

Thanks for all your ports on MorphOS !!!

Quote:

Of course it will be part of the next MorphOS 3.10 update but it also was a requirement for some tools in the already released SDK.

Quote:

Read the release notes next time :) There's a big fat warning about ixemul there.

Quote:

Indeed, I found the warning. Maybe the installer should show it before copying to MOSSYS:Libs/?
Best would be to have a fallback to 50.10. I know, it's more work for you but makes life easier for us

Quote:

Not possible, the reason it requires such specific versions is because there has been internal (either new functionality or critical fixes) changes to the library. However if you as a developer know what you are doing it's still possible to link with older startup code so that latest ixemul isn't required.


- CISC

The SDK itself requires an up-to-date ixemul and usually relies on bugfixes in said library, so SDK updating the libs is a must, sorry.

If you really need to pass ixemul builds around, bundle the shared library as well. I would strongly encourage to aim for libnix ports though.

Quote:

I see.

Your last statement reminds me of Geit.
I told him: The keylargo.resource is buggy, it's impossible to type fast.
He said: It's (maybe) a hardware limitation of the matrix.
Me again: It works flawlessly with OSX.
He again: I use an external keyboard.


[ Editiert durch polluks 18.08.2016 - 20:51 ]

Updating the SDK is a very time consuming process. Having to deal with multiple ixemul.library versions would mean almost doubling the work.

I have no idea why you would be talking to Geit about keylargo :)

Okay, I have the source, so I could even support you!

Maybe I was feeling a bit frustrated about Geit

@polluks

Funny that "Mr. one word bug report" talks about frustration. :D


PS. I for sure said "Maybe it is a limitation ...".

Quote:
It's not your fault, you simply didn't hid5de (<< the bug) fast enough at geit@home
BTW #2963 has a few more words.

Quote:

Why not build the SDK tools without ixemul as well?

Quote:

That'd open up a different can of worms :) ixemul has case sensitive paths, libnix does not. That'd make it hard to ensure everything cross compiles for example. I have two requirements for the SDK - it has to be able to build MorphOS and it has to be able to build itself (under MorphOS). I have serious doubts that'd be possible with libnix.

@Papiosaur

Is it possible to upload the said library at morphos storage, or is it prohibited? Even with a notice that it might screw thing up if installed. It is needed for an increased set of proggies and I would rather not download the complete SDK just for a couple of kbs space.

Quote:

What set?

>> It is needed for an increased set of proggies

> What set?

The set consisting at least of the elements mentioned in comment #4 and the one there ;-)