My Hollywood project spans 7 files. One XML, and the rest .HWS files. After I've got all the files from my work partition in their respective folders to show up in the workspace files, I save the project to the root directory of my work partition. Note that Hollywood itself is on SYS:Applications/Hollywood/ on a totally different partition. When I try to load back the projects, I get a blank entry in the workspace tree. Saving as a workspace makes no difference either. However, if I save the Workspace file (rapaedit.xwks)and Project file (rapaedit.xprj) in the same directory (root of work:) the project suddenly works. Do I need both files and if so, why doesn't the project saver not specify that I need the workspace in the same directory?

If interested, here is RapaEdit's GitHub repo.

oops

[ Editiert durch polluks 06.01.2021 - 07:44 ]

Quote:

No, you don't need to have a workspace. A workspace is basically a container for one or several projects so that they can be loaded together and for instance linked to each other in the build projecess.

If you don't have a workspace, should just load your project manuarlly (Project->Open Project... or Open Recent Project).. I would recommend that you put your project file at the top your project directories. In your case this would be alongside RapaEdit.hws I guess. That's the most logical and best place and the best tested. It should work to put it in other places as well but at any rate, do not place it on a different partition as file locations are saved in relative terms inside the project file. I might allow for absolute paths in the future but in the meanwhile I should probably warn the user with a requester.

Now that we have Nadir attention...;)

Sometimes I want to try a quick and dirty test but dont want to have the hard drive with it so want to use ram disk. The problem is that using ram: the project path is broken.
Can anyone confirm it please?

Sorry for not opening another thread.

Quote:

Yes, there are still some issues related to that. I'll try to look into it.

@tolkien
You may relabel RAM: or use the brand new RAD:

Oh yes! The new rad: should be fine!
Thanks Polluks!

Will rad: startup after a reboot like in classic? :)