Order of the Butterfly
Posts: 315 from 2004/2/13
From: Naples - Italy
Well, let me redirect the discussion towards Elena, and let me remark that she does not like MUI and never wanted to change ZoneXplorer GUI from Reaction to MUI.
Furthermore Elena is young. And patience is not a typical virtue of all young persons. The current situation of the platform requires patience. We know it is quenched by difficult interactions among many parts. And starting another moaning session is useless.
Besides principles and incomprehensions there is a very simple problem: "lack of resources" = "insufficient money". I see only one way in which our platform might obtain money: Genesi should sell plenty of EFIKAs or OSWs. If this will happen, we must only expect that money lubricate frictions.
Just to mitigate further polemics, let me do a scientific digression about some sentences by Elena. So, after this intervention, most people will be so bored that none will have the wish to discuss further.
During the interview, Elena mentions her attempt to construct an extended complex field in three dimensions. Unfortunately that attempt was condemned to fail because of higher level rules!
\BEGIN Lesson mode
Various kinds of numbers were constructed starting from the simplest set of numbers: positive integers. These attempts originated, in a sequence of increasing complexity: relative numbers, rational numbers, real numbers, complex numbers. The guideline was always the attempt to perform certain operations on numbers of the current set, and the fact that, to obtain always a result, an extension was necessary.
But, technically speaking, the field of complex numbers is algebraically closed, so further extensions are not fields, and this implies strong limitations and exotic properties. People invented quaternions (Hamilton, 1843), octonions (Cayley, 1845), sedenions, and similar beasts. All of them live in 4, 8, 16 dimensions; and all of them loose some properties of usual numbers.
Quaternions are not commutative: ab is not always equal to ba.
Octonions are also not associative: (ab)c is not always equal to a(bc).
Sedenions have also zero divisors: ab=0 is possible even if both a and b are different from zero.
Gulp! All readers sleeping!
\END Lesson mode.
[ Edited by DoctorMorbius_FP on 2006/7/25 23:19 ]
Powered by PegasosII-G4, MacMini, PowerMac MDD.