• Jim
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Jim
    Posts: 4977 from 2009/1/28
    From: Delaware, USA
    No, No, No. That's an error/typo.

    It should be
    This also does not eliminate the possibility that these are re-labeled chips.

    >What do you mean "overclock"? Attempting to run the part past 133 >MHz? Running a 133 MHz part at 120 MHz ist *under*-clocking, >assuming the "possibility that these are re-labeled chips" is >eliminated.

    No, I'm still pretty sure these are re-labeled chips. So over, not under.

    >Yes, but are there any socketed alternatives to a 133 MHz 060FE? >Anything like an 68(EC)060RC133?

    That 133 designation is really getting to you, isn't it?
    Its fiction. And no, there are no EC parts with 133 speed ratings (and, for that matter,there are no FE chips rated to 133).

    If the Natami team supports this fiction, then they may offend Freescale.


    [ Edited by Jim 06.06.2011 - 15:33 ]
    "Never attribute to malice what can more readily explained by incompetence"
  • »06.06.11 - 14:26
    Profile