> No proof has been provided that Motorola never granted a license to
> any company in China, or any other country to reproduce their 680x0
> designs and label them using the Motorola trademark.

...as well as the Motorola/Freescale naming scheme in such a misleading way that it implies the incorporation of both an MMU and FPU when in fact they have none.

> If you claims had stopped there and not gone into the realm of claiming
> that they are, or probably are, rebadged slower Motorola, or Freescale
> parts, I would not have had any disagreement with you.

I stand by my assessment that they probably are rebadged slower Motorola/Freescale parts.

> Since it is mostly impossible to prove a negative, regarding the
> existence or lack of a license to produce these chips, I don't see
> this argument ever being resolved

Assuming a Freescale representative said that there has never been any such license granted by either Freescale or Motorola Semiconductor I'd be inclined to accept this as proof of the non-existence of such license. Until then I won't change my opinion that I find the existence of such license highly improbable.