> Obviously, they're wrong. As you pointed out.

Actually, I just stated my severe doubts. That's not quite the same as stating they're wrong.

> I'm not sure why anyone would defend that position
> "license produced copies of the Motorola design"

It could be that for the public perception of the Natami project using "license produced copies of the Motorola design" sounds better than using "illegally relabelled Motorola chips" ;-)

> No speculation there.

It seems that this is not acknowledged by all participants of this thread ;-)