X1000
  • Jim
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Jim
    Posts: 4977 from 2009/1/28
    From: Delaware, USA
    Great summary Andreas. I hadn't even had a chance to go over this yet (and now I don't have to).
    The Sb800 SATA controllers are 3.0. What are the P5s?

    With an SB800 series Southbridge we also gain additional SATA controllers (six total).

    Very interesting comparison.
    W/O SB - X4+X4+X1 PCIe 2 SATA
    W SB X4+X4+X1+X1 PCIe 6 SATA and PCI

    [ Edited by Jim on 2011/3/21 4:46 ]

    [ Edited by Jim on 2011/3/21 11:04 ]
    "Never attribute to malice what can more readily explained by incompetence"
  • »21.03.11 - 02:45
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12058 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    > The Sb800 SATA controllers are 3.0.

    On SB850, yes. SB810 has only 2.0.

    > What are the P5s?

    2.0.

    > Very interesting comparison.
    > W/O SB - X4+X4+X1 PCIe 2 SATA
    > W SB X4+X4+X1+X1 PCIe 6 SATA and PCI

    The question is whether those benefits of having the SB800 would really be worth the additional costs.

    [ Edited by Andreas_Wolf on 2011/3/21 17:04 ]
  • »21.03.11 - 02:51
    Profile
  • Jim
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Jim
    Posts: 4977 from 2009/1/28
    From: Delaware, USA
    Yes, this isn't like the MPC8641, where if you didn't use a Southbridge you didn't have certain peripherals.
    The P5 is fairly complete without the Southbridge. It would bring us PCI slots for legacy hardware. It doesn't actually cost us any PCIe expandability (we actually we gain one X1).

    And we gain several SATA controllers and sound output. You must admit that two SATA controllers is somewhat limited.

    But it does add cost and complexity. You can already guess what side my opinion falls on, but the simpler option might be the more sensible one.
    "Never attribute to malice what can more readily explained by incompetence"
  • »21.03.11 - 16:22
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12058 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    > (we actually we gain one X1). And we gain [...] sound output.

    Here I think you counted one and the same thing twice. *Either* the SB800 gains us audio (but no additional PCIe) *or* it gains us one x1 (but no audio over the other solution with dedicated audio chip or card on x1).

    > You must admit that two SATA controllers is somewhat limited.

    For me personally, two SATA controllers would be sufficient.

    > the simpler option might be the more sensible one.

    I second that.
  • »21.03.11 - 17:36
    Profile
  • Jim
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Jim
    Posts: 4977 from 2009/1/28
    From: Delaware, USA
    Well, we should be able to add an additional SATA controller via the X1 PCIe lane.

    Frankly, I wouldn't find 2 SATA controllers adequate.

    With one SATA connection used for DVD, that only leaves us one connector for a hard drive. I'd prefer at least two.

    But we can probably flesh out a complete system without a Southbridge.
    "Never attribute to malice what can more readily explained by incompetence"
  • »21.03.11 - 19:18
    Profile
  • Jim
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Jim
    Posts: 4977 from 2009/1/28
    From: Delaware, USA
    OK Andreas, how long do you think it will be before we can get specifications on the P5 that are as good as those you referenced on the SB810/850?
    Also, would it make more sense to go for a P5010 based system or one based on the P5020?
    "Never attribute to malice what can more readily explained by incompetence"
  • »21.03.11 - 22:08
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12058 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    > how long do you think it will be before we can get specifications
    > on the P5 that are as good as those you referenced on the SB810/850?

    Somewhen in the course of this year, I guess.

    > would it make more sense to go for a P5010 based system or
    > one based on the P5020?

    That would depend on the price difference between the two.
  • »21.03.11 - 22:26
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12058 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    Update:

    > the annual Freescale Technology Forum. The titles of this year's
    > technical sessions have already been published:
    > [...]
    > "Using Freescale's AltiVec SIMD Engine for Graphics, Image Processing,
    > Radar, Video Surveillance and Other Applications
    "
    >
    > They didn't have sessions on AltiVec for some years. I guess this is going
    > to be a foretaste of AltiVec-enabled QorIQ T.

    Detailed descriptions of the sessions are online:

    http://www.getregisterednow.com/FSL/CEX/Session.aspx?li=1

    From there:

    "During this session, attendees will gain insight into the next-generation QorIQ products that provide heterogeneous cores, AltiVec-enablement and assured computing with significant overall system performance within embedded power budgets." (FTF-NET-F0273)

    "AltiVec technology, the SIMD accelerator on current e600 core microprocessors, has found a home on the QorIQ processor roadmap and has proven useful in graphics, image processing, printing, radar, sonar, video surveillance and other markets. This presentation will look at some of the performance enhancements achieved with original AltiVec technology and the improvements incorporated in the updated version." (FTF-NET-F0531)

    I'm really eager to see what those "improvements incorporated in the updated version" of AltiVec are about. That goes in line with what Glenn Beck, marketing manager for aerospace, defense and single board computing within Freescale's Networking Processor Division, said when he divulged six months ago that with AltiVec they "have taken a proven technology, enhanced it, and moved it to the multicore QorIQ family of processors". I hope it will be better than IBM's VMX128.

    Edit: PDF presentation with mention of "Enhanced AltiVec" (page 8):

    http://www.advantech.eu/adf/file/munich/agenda/Advantech_Design-In_Forum_QorIQ.pdf

    [ Edited by Andreas_Wolf 14.04.2011 - 14:44 ]
  • »25.03.11 - 23:05
    Profile
  • Jim
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Jim
    Posts: 4977 from 2009/1/28
    From: Delaware, USA
    Man you're willing to dig to find info.

    Three days and 1 one hour session.
    FTF-NET-F0531 Thursday 09:00 1 hour Salon F

    I dug through a lot of those sessions and the one you quoted is one of the few I'd have any interest in.

    Why don't we just contact Bill Mercer after the event and see if he can offer a summary?
    "Never attribute to malice what can more readily explained by incompetence"
  • »25.03.11 - 23:40
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12058 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    > Three days

    It's four days, Monday through Thursday.

    > the one you quoted is one of the few I'd have any interest in.

    Let me guess the others: FTF-NET-F0394 and FTF-NET-F0399. Correct? :-)

    > Why don't we just contact Bill Mercer after the event and see if
    > he can offer a summary?

    We won't have to do that as Freescale will offer all presentation slides for public download, as usual.
  • »25.03.11 - 23:57
    Profile
  • Jim
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Jim
    Posts: 4977 from 2009/1/28
    From: Delaware, USA
    >We won't have to do that as Freescale will offer all presentation slides for public download, as usual.

    Now you have my attention, sir!
    Yeah! Hard info on the T5!
    "Never attribute to malice what can more readily explained by incompetence"
  • »26.03.11 - 00:59
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12058 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    Update:

    > 1.5 weeks ago A-Eon changed the X1000's official specs from 1.8 GHz to 2.0 GHz.

    3.5 weeks ago they changed it to "nominal 2.0GHz (1.8GHz standard)".

    http://www.a-eon.com/x1000.html

    It could mean that it is supposed to be delivered underclocked at 1.8 GHz with heatsink but without fan and that the user who wants to run it at nominal 2.0 GHz speed would have to add a fan himself. Assuming this suspicion is true would leave one question though: If the usage of the extra 200 MHz of *one* core should require the addition of a fan what's with the usage of *both* cores at 1.8 GHz, e.g. under Linux?
  • »14.04.11 - 10:09
    Profile
  • Paladin of the Pegasos
    Paladin of the Pegasos
    SoundSquare
    Posts: 1213 from 2004/12/1
    From: Paris, France
    Quote:

    Yes, strange. And another odd claim:

    "PA Semi n'ayant pris qu'une licence d'architecture auprès d'IBM"

    Google translation:

    "PA Semi did not take an architectural license from IBM"


    actually the right translation is "PA Semi only took an architectural licence from IBM"

    some twisted french syntax :-)
  • »03.05.11 - 18:40
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12058 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    >> Google translation:
    >> "PA Semi did not take an architectural license from IBM"

    > actually the right translation is "PA Semi only took an architectural licence from IBM"

    Thanks for clarification. I put way too much faith into Google it seems ;-)
  • »03.05.11 - 21:05
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12058 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    Addendum:

    > I guess there're still some information to be revealed to get the whole "quite a story".

    A-Eon didn't reveal it so far (no idea why), but as there're still discussions on this and questions occuring at various places I'm going to tell how I perceive this "quite a story" came along in chronological order:

    1. A-Eon decides for the PA6T, approaches P.A.Semi for recommendation of a board design company with PA6T experience and subsequently get turned to Varisys.
    2. A-Eon plans on buying PA6T chips from P.A.Semi, but before it's able to place an order P.A.Semi is purchased by Apple (April 2008).
    3. Apple decides to supply the PA6T to P.A.Semi's existing customers only, which A-Eon is not but Varisys is.
    4. Apple calls P.A.Semi's existing customers for final PA6T orders as the chip is going to be discontinued. Varisys informs A-Eon about this call.
    5. A-Eon asks Varisys to place an order for an (unknown to us) amount of PA6T chips. Varisys agrees.
    6. Varisys orders the chips from Apple. The chips arrive at Varisys.
    7. A-Eon in turn purchases those chips from Varisys, effectively rendering Varisys A-Eon's CPU supplier (the chips remain at Varisys, though, for obvious reasons). As part of this supply agreement between Varisys and A-Eon, Varisys demands an NDA* to be signed.

    * The reason for Varisys' NDA requirement is even more speculative than my timeline. Maybe the supply agreement between Apple and its PA6T customers contained the condition that the customer must not resell the chips to 3rd parties, which is what Varisys effectively did though, so they feared penalty from Apple. It's odd at least that Varisys was officially revealed as A-Eon's design partner in June 2010 while the exact type of CPU was only officially revealed half a year later (which must be when the NDA ended).
  • »06.05.11 - 19:21
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12058 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    Addendum:

    > > would it make more sense to go for a P5010 based system or
    > > one based on the P5020?

    > That would depend on the price difference between the two.

    No prices on the P5 yet, but seeing the price difference the number of cores makes with the P4 going for the P5010 could be a sensible decision:

    https://morph.zone/modules/newbb_plus/viewtopic.php?forum=11&topic_id=6196&start=160

    With the P4 halving the amount of CPU cores cuts off chip price by 25%. Don't know if Freescale will apply this policy also to P5 though.
  • »16.05.11 - 00:51
    Profile
  • Jim
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Jim
    Posts: 4977 from 2009/1/28
    From: Delaware, USA
    >A-Eon didn't reveal it so far (no idea why), but as there're still discussions on this and questions occuring at various places I'm going to tell how I perceive this "quite a story" came along in chronological order:

    Everyone should keep in mind that Andreas is probably right about this sequence of events (in fact, his explanation is the only on that fits the facts), but this is still speculation.

    Obviously, for the reasons stated in Andreas' summary, Trevor and the rest of A-eon haven't been able to reveal some of this information.
    "Never attribute to malice what can more readily explained by incompetence"
  • »16.05.11 - 16:35
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12058 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    > Obviously, for the reasons stated in Andreas' summary,
    > Trevor and the rest of A-eon haven't been able to reveal
    > some of this information.

    Really? Could you name those reasons? I ask because as I stated above I've "no idea why" some of those information should still be confidential when the NDA between Varisys and A-Eon had ended in (or before) December 2010 obviously.
  • »16.05.11 - 16:53
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    amigadave
    Posts: 2793 from 2006/3/21
    From: Northern Calif...
    I can think of three reasons for the info not to be released.

    1. The NDA is still in effect.

    2. The information to be released could be embarrassing to the person/company responsible for releasing, or not releasing it.

    3. The person/company responsible for making the decision to release, or not release the information does not think it is important one way or the other and feels there is no reason to respond to any requests for such information.
    MorphOS - The best Next Gen Amiga choice.
  • »20.05.11 - 01:46
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12058 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    > 1. The NDA is still in effect.

    Unlikely, else A-Eon wouldn't have revealed the type of CPU in December 2010. The information on the CPU was part of the NDA according to A-Eon.

    > 2. The information to be released could be embarrassing to the
    > person/company responsible for releasing, or not releasing it.

    Could be.

    > 3. The person/company responsible for making the decision to release, or
    > not release the information does not think it is important one way or the other
    > and feels there is no reason to respond to any requests for such information.

    Unlikely, else A-Eon wouldn't have teased us with its "quite a story" comment.

    http://www.google.com/search?q=%22a-eon%22+%22quite+a+story%22
  • »20.05.11 - 12:05
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12058 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    >> We won't have to do that as Freescale will offer all presentation slides
    >> for public download, as usual.

    > Now you have my attention, sir! Yeah! Hard info on the T5!

    I seems that this year Freescale for whatever reason requires to login in order to be able to download the FTF presentation slides. Pity, I'd really like to know what the improvements of the updated AltiVec are.

    http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/overview.jsp?code=FTF_2011_AMERICA_OLL_CAT
  • »22.06.11 - 00:04
    Profile
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    boot_wb
    Posts: 874 from 2007/4/9
    From: Kingston upon ...
    @Andreas

    The registration process is simple enough, and open to the public.
    www.hullchimneyservices.co.uk

    UI: Powerbook 5,6 (1.67GHz, 128MB VRam): OS3.1, OSX 10.5.8
    HTPC: Mac Mini G4 (1,5GHz, 64MB VRam): OS3.1 (ZVNC)
    Audiophile: Efika 5200b (SB Audigy): OS3.1 (VNC + Virtual Monitor)

    Windows free since 2011!
  • »22.06.11 - 17:18
    Profile Visit Website
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12058 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    > The registration process is simple enough, and open to the public.

    I know that. But there's no need to as Jim is kind enough to relay the slides I'm interested in. I'm just wondering why Freescale changed the policy after years of making the FTF slides available without having to login. Besides, you just can't easily link to files that are not publically available without registering ;-)
  • »22.06.11 - 17:28
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    magnetic
    Posts: 2129 from 2003/3/1
    From: Los Angeles
    Umm its called data mining.

    But you wont be able to register anyway as you are a bot.
    Pegasos 2 Rev 2B3 w/ Freescale 7447 "G4" @ 1ghz / 1gb Nanya Ram
    Quad Boot: MorphOS 2.7 | Amiga OS4.1 U4 | Ubuntu PPC GNU/Linux | OS X 10.4
  • »23.06.11 - 10:35
    Profile Visit Website
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12058 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    > you are a bot.

    Seems the other half of your split personality disagrees with you:

    https://morph.zone/modules/newbb_plus/viewtopic.php?forum=11&topic_id=5724&start=40
  • »23.06.11 - 10:42
    Profile