> 100% of what the "customers" pay for, is for the promise of it being
> *the fastest way of running OS4*

...which it is due to the hardware.

> much thanks to the announced SMP feature

It's already "the fastest way of running OS4" right now, without the second core in use.

> one of the most noticeable parts that simply isn't developed
> yet, "Xena" and "Xorro" are other

https://morph.zone/modules/newbb_plus/viewtopic.php?forum=3&topic_id=7183&start=663

> the OS isn't even supporting the on-board controllers yet

It isn't supporting *all* the on-board controllers yet, namely two (audio and Ethernet). The rest is supported as far as I'm aware.

> Jens Schönfeld

What has Jens Schönfeld to do with anything I wrote?

> You can't buy it from [...] AmigaKit, not even from www.a-eon.com.

You were able to buy it from AmigaKit, which has been appointed A-Eon's "Primary Channel Distributor" for the AmigaOne X1000.

> it has a lot to prove, a helluvalot more than the Raspberry Pi

And yet you can't order a Raspberry Pi this instant and have it shipped to you today :-)

> producing some handfull of motherboards based on individual e-mail
> correspondence directly between the producer and purchaser

AFAIK, the purchasers' correspondence has been with AmigaKit, not with A-Eon.

> production counted in tens of units

Do you claim that one production batch size of Nemo boards is smaller than 100 units?

> I remember Thendic France operated like that on their very first,
> tiny batch of Pegasos 1 boards, a very long time before the first
> April patch was released [...]. [...] as products they were
> definitely prototype class. Overall similarities with the current
> AmigaOne X1000 situation is striking.

All pre-April2 Pegasos boards are prone to data corruption. I've yet to hear that about the AmigaOne X1000 and its Nemo v2.1 board.

> the market [...] may already be saturated; those few interested
> enough has already got one

There are still people on forums claiming they want to get one with the next batch. Do you think they're lying?

> It's a none-product! Vapor, until proven differently!
> [...] At best it could be considered a prototype

I'm still not convinced, and I still think it has been proven differently.

> I have understood as much as you don't share my views of "vapor".

That's correct.

> I don't share your views of "product".

I have a feeling this might be exclusive to things connected with OS4 :-P

> I think I will be proven right in the end

Regarding what exactly?