> My point is that before anyone writes in a public forum a conclusion > that states that someone else has lied several times, if condition > "X" is true, should be more careful, or verify the condition before > writing such a statement, or perhaps choose to write the statement > in a different way without the words liar, lying, etc.
I don't think your point makes sense. Maybe you should look up the concept of conditions and what they're used for. And I stand by what I said: If Varisys was A-Eon's CPU supplier, Trevor Dickinson would have lied to us. You see how the conclusion to become true requires the premise to be true beforehand? For this statement to make I don't need to verify if the premise is true or not.
> Being labeled as a liar
Nobody labelled Dickinson a liar here.
> I understand and agree with Trevor's angry > response to the original statement by Andreas.
