Andreas_Wolf wrote:
>> number6 doesn't seem to be aware of those emails being part of a legal document
>> unless I'm misreading comment #1084.

> Sorry if #1084 was confusing.

It was crystal clear to me

> July 2, 2019

Yes, but July 2 is not June 9 (see comments #1087 to #1089), hence my hedging.

> This mentioned, albeit more briefly some of the information we now see in totality
> with the email exchange between Bill & Ben.

Yes, I got this the first time round Questions are: Can it be precluded that the emails are annexed as exhibits to the July 2 filing? And can it be assummed that the emails weren't exhibited before July 2 (if at all)?