> It's on his Twitter. Look at June 9th. The actual document is here.
> Edit: Makes more sense to look here for the relevant passage. It does not contain the emails.

This is because none of this is about the emails (which is what your claim was about and what my reply referred to specifically), but about Hermans using the Monard name for trademark filing (which has been known for more than 2 years already thanks to number6 trying to follow the trademark registration tohubohu).

> These were apparently submitted as evidence

At which date? It wasn't May or June (neither before), I reckon.