Even if we take the Paul C Clements analysis seriously.
Paul C Clements still has a problem with logic.
Paul C Clements proves in his analysis that Amiga Os 3.1 MAY have not been made on the basis of Amiga Os 1.3 and in his conlusion that's why Hyperion has not rights to Amiga Os 1.3.
Paul C Clements is wrong ofcourse.
If Paul C Clements proves in his analysis that Amiga Os 3.1 MUST have not been made on the basis of Amiga Os 1.3 he will be right.
In reality 3.1 is based on 2.0 this on 1.3, 3.1 include 1.3 and 1.3 can be cut off from 3.1.