Order of the Butterfly
Posts: 483 from 2008/8/10
Quote:
Andreas_Wolf wrote:
> we have [...] an issue between Jens and Mike mentioned
> in news before [...] the detail in the Neuss show notes
Before? Where was this mentioned?
> the Neuss show notes will continue to be called fake from
> those who benefit from applying that label to them.
Was any of this "fake" calling done in public?
If you prefer, I'll call the "prior to Neuss" my opinion:
2001 and the 3 updates sinceIt would seem to me that there would have been issues prior to both Neuss and the latest Amiganews story, in the intervening time from 2001-2017, which then prompted the string of edits/updates.
I used "fake" for emphasis. If people cling to the thought that the sources discussed are "anonymous" and therefore hold no credibility, then I don't think abbreviating that to the one word "fake" is that much of a stretch. Use of the exact word "fake" has not been used in public afaik.
I do have a question for you or anyone who might have a reasonable explanation though.
Why did Hyperion just days ago file an appeal to overturn their refused opposition to the EUIPO filing for the Amiga trademark by "Drews, Heinz-Alexander", especially given that Amiga Inc. registered the tm and now has apparently transferred same to Cloanto?
Source#6
