I said it's a nice feature and pretty handy an cpu weak computers, but this is not game changing, It's just catching up in one standard discipline.
Not bad though, really not.

Quote:
Personally, assuming mainstream video codecs are in fact supported which Spectre660 has not confirmed, I find it to be a million times more useful than being able to run smartphone games on desktop hardware.

That said, for better or for worse, media consumption on desktop computers has moved towards web browsers. If a 50 EUR tablet can smoothly play videos on any HTML5-compliant web page but your 1000 EUR desktop computer struggles with 360P and you are expected to use semi-clunky external tools for smooth high-resolution playback that only support one or two video portals, then that would be less "game changing" and more "not even really in the game" territory.

Of course, as usual, none of this information is provided and people are expected to merely guess and speculate after reading 3,000 word blog posts and watching minutes of video footage.

Quote:
If you expect people to invest 700+ EUR on compatible mainboards and graphics cards, being able to play HD video is the bare minimum bar in 2020, I'd say. Not "game changing" but certainly an accomplishment.

That said, regardless of how smooth the playback might be, I myself could not stand watching videos with messed up color palettes so black looks grey...

@ASiegel

does this apply to what you are discussing?

#6

Simultaneous playback : Sam460ex .Frameskip=Disabled . Videofilter =Yes

Screenshot


Video #1


ID_FILENAME=Media:Videos/Benchmarking_Videos/Top Gun Maverick (2020) - Official Trailer_3840x1600_23.97FPS.mkv
ID_DEMUXER=lavfpref
ID_VIDEO_FORMAT=462H
ID_VIDEO_BITRATE=0
ID_VIDEO_WIDTH=3840
ID_VIDEO_HEIGHT=1600
ID_VIDEO_FPS=23.976
ID_VIDEO_ASPECT=0.0000
ID_AUDIO_FORMAT=A4PM
ID_AUDIO_BITRATE=0
ID_AUDIO_RATE=48000
ID_AUDIO_NCH=6
ID_START_TIME=0.00
ID_LENGTH=142.55
ID_SEEKABLE=1
ID_CHAPTERS=0
==========================================================================

Video #2

ID_FILENAME=Media:Videos/Benchmarking_Videos/DCS World - 4K Test - UltraWide - 21_9 - 3840 x 1600_29.89FPS.mkv
ID_DEMUXER=lavfpref
ID_VIDEO_FORMAT=462H
ID_VIDEO_BITRATE=0
ID_VIDEO_WIDTH=3840
ID_VIDEO_HEIGHT=1600
ID_VIDEO_FPS=29.900
ID_VIDEO_ASPECT=0.0000
ID_AUDIO_FORMAT=A4PM
ID_AUDIO_BITRATE=0
ID_AUDIO_RATE=44100
ID_AUDIO_NCH=2
ID_START_TIME=0.00
ID_LENGTH=253.21
ID_SEEKABLE=1
ID_CHAPTERS=0
==========================================================================


[ Edited by Spectre660 01.01.2020 - 13:15 ]

@ASiegel

No issue with color palettes here .

Quote:

Just a thought since you are trying to report what can be achieved here...

Most people would simply ask if they can play H/D or HiDef in sync and without frameskip using a high stress codec, which would be expected from almost any source these days.

PPC MPlayer is not getting bugs fixed. In fact the bug report was closed without being addressed for what is showing up in your Video and Audio codecs output.

It might be helpful to mention that it's not "462H", but "H264" for video codec, and it's not "A4PM" but "MP4A" for audio codec.

#6

Quote:
Not quite. When you are bragging about being able to decode videos that exceed 1080P resolutions this only has any real-world relevance if you support HEVC or VP9 codecs.

For example, YouTube does not stream 4K or 1440P videos in H264... (or the older less demanding MPEG-2, for that matter).

Thanks for that.
If I had corrected them in the output though some would probably have called me a Doctor of sorts .

Quote:

@ Spectre660

For Sam460 owners quite a nice thing. And I actually think it's fine for future Tabor owners, too as it may compensate a bit for the stupid cpu choice. Offloading as much as possible to the gpu is on a non smp low cpu power system always a good thing (on other systems, too, but not as necessary). And if you doomed to weak cpus probably the only way forward...

Quote:
I will have to take your word for it. The promotional video shared via YouTube clearly looks to have wrong colors (see the trailer part).

@ASiegel

I used to run the test videos also on a Windows machine with the Sam460ex and Windows monitors basically side by side. Did not spot any palette issues with the Sam460ex.

Quote:

From developer pov gdb saves too much time to resign from it just beacuse some here still have mental problems with ppc.

gdb is something that I really miss on MOS. Custom solutions in MOS are nice but gdb is better.

Doing 3D without 3D hardware on vampire as it was done on pc about 1994 does not make any sense.

It is waste of work and time for nothing.

@ASiegel

In stages .
For HEVC and VP9 we will have to see what the future holds .
Next challenge to get through is accessing enough video ram for full 4k playback.


Quote:

> PPC MPlayer is not getting bugs fixed. In fact the bug report was closed
> without being addressed for what is showing up in your Video and Audio
> codecs output. It might be helpful to mention that it's not "462H", but
> "H264" for video codec, and it's not "A4PM" but "MP4A" for audio codec.

If both Emotion (as shown in the video) and MPlayer exhibit this same issue, it seems to be with FFmpeg, which both are based on.

I used Mplayer to get the detailed video info. Emotion to actually play the videos.

Quote:



[ Edited by Spectre660 03.01.2020 - 21:37 ]

Quote:

Excuse my ignorance, but is this because Emotion does not have option for verbose text output?
Also, if you are getting the text info from MPlayer, why are you not -playing- the file with MPlayer?

#6

>> If both Emotion (as shown in the video) and MPlayer exhibit this
>> same issue, it seems to be with FFmpeg, which both are based on.

> I used Mplayer to get the detailed video info. Emotion to actually play the videos.

Ah okay. I misunderstood then.

The file info with Emotion is displayed by selecting the "about" Menu Item.
Which gives Progam version and the decoding option available.
Both of these have not been made available to the public yet.


Quote:

> if you are getting the text info from MPlayer, why
> are you not -playing- the file with MPlayer?

I guess because MPlayer doesn't support GPU-accelerated video decoding (yet), which is what this whole exercise is about :-)

Quote:

Good one.
With at least 7 different developers involved at some point with MPlayer and the continued discussions on AW about performance based on different versions optimized for different h/w....this is not always simple to grasp. heh.

#6

Quote:

Why do you keep repeating yourself over and over? The fear must be deep.

Quote:

No "Amiga ppc" does not. What you are pushing advocacy for here is not "Amiga".

We Amiga users use ppc Amigas because they are better Amigas than these produced by Commodore after ECS.
Some idiots in Amiga community waste time on attacks on ppc because they think that if they attack enough long there will be switch to x86.
This is not going to happen as long as Amiga solutions on x86 are shit compared to win/osx/lnx.
So dear redrumloa stop this crap and start hard work on AROS or MOS on x86.

Quote:

AmigaOnes are in no way CBM/Escom continuation, and all except SAM440 had quirks and shortcomings not supported fully in OS4, or board was crippled in way (single SATA, slower mem. etc.).
XE - bad mem and USB
SAM 440 - only fully supported board, espec. M9 version
SAM460 - unsupported DMA onboard SATA, even today
x1000 - buggy CFE, no support for LAN, other core, 2GB+ PCI-E wired to Xena with no use,
slower PCI slots, BETA OS TO PREPAID OS 4.2
x5000 - no support for LAN, other core, 2GB+, PCI-E wired to Xena, less expandable then x1000
STILL BETA OS NO FULL DRV, only good thing is MOS support (as with SAM460ex)
x5000/040 - exists but its hidden, too expensive and not so fast by Linux tests
Tabor - in Linux existance for few years
STILL BETA OS NO FULL DRV

None of great PPC board has out of box PPC Linux support in major distros LIKE ALL OTHER PPC32 and PPC64 computers do have!

I mean, can you do a proper job, once in a while.

Do a single CPU, OS4 max hw design or improve OS to hardware. Mac PPCs are great machines compared to this jungle



[ Edited by vox 06.01.2020 - 14:16 ]

We Amiga users use ppc Amigas because they are better Amigas than these produced by Commodore after ECS.
I have in the past a1200 it has many times too slow graphics - famous lack of chunky pixels.
My various ppc Amigas even if not perfect deserve more on Amiga name than amiga 1200.
At least graphics is as fast as on pc.
Get lost dear vox.