Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
Posts: 712 from 2006/5/28
From: Germany
Quote:ppcamiga1 wrote:
Quote:
Cego wrote:
Sorry to say that, but everybody who keeps trashing the Vampire is an ignorant amiga hater. Who the f... would compare any real hardware to emulated one? This is beyond trolling.
Some losers where fooled by gunnar von boehn, and think that chipset is important.
From developer point of view, it is patetic.
Poor amiga blitter almost not changed from 1983 is as fast as it was in 1983.
Yes amiga blitter was faster than 68000 but is slower than 68020.
Any Amiga made after nov 1992 when a1200 and a4000 production start, no matter who made it, Commodore, Escom, Eyetech, A-Eon, Acube has cpu faster than poor amiga blitter as fast as it was in 1983.
There is no reason to not compare vampire crap with amiga ppc and uae.
The chipset is what the amiga made what it is. It is the architecture. Its the most important part of the hardware! I dont really get your point. What do you want to tell us? That the old blitter is slow compared to todays standard? You probably dont know what Vampire is all about, how it performs and what the differences are compared to the old classics chipset. Ever heard of SAGA? The Vampire is the next step in classic amiga evolution. Get it? I think you're having some personal issues with Gunnar. Your whole argument doesnt make any sense. Just go out and buy some cheap x86 system running UAE or some crap custom PPC hardware or old Apple products and be happy, if you think that this is amiga...
Neither MorphOS running on a Mac or Pegasos is real Amiga nor any emulated Amiga hardware on some cheap x86.
Amiga was and will always be about its custom chip architecture. Wether you like it or not. And this is what both the community and developers want. No emulation, no PPC.
Pegasos II G4 @1.0GHz, 1GB DDR Ram, Radeon 9200Pro, 240GB SSD+160GB HD, MorphOS 3.18, AmigaOS4.1 FE, Debian 8
