Thanks for your reply Andreas_Wolf :)

>The OS has to support the board, not the other way round. First the board is created, then the OS is adapted to support the board components.

Yes you are right, but if important things like compatibility, FPU etc. isn't considered, it might jeopardise the OS, or severely limit it, as what seems the case.

>In June, Trevor wrote in his blog about Tabor that spectre660 "is about to receive his first A-EON Technology hardware".

Which would maybe explain why Spectre660 is "defending" the product. Of course, I have nothing against Spectre660 or even the fact that he is entitled to have and voice his opinions.

By the way, any chance of change the topic, it is a bit, tasteless.