Quote:

Kind of negative way to look at things. Any new port of MorphOS is going to be a lot of work. I see the Sam as being as valid a target as PPC Macs because the Sam would seem to have a future. It'd be nice to see the Efika developed too but it's not as if MorphOS will run on the next bPlan/Genesi hardware with zero effort.

[ Edited by ausPPC on 2008/9/28 16:31 ]

Quote:

Anyone who has bought a Sam is going to be someone who was hoping OS4 would be ported. Very few people are going to buy both OS4 and MorphOS.

Quote:

That remains to be seen. We don't know what the profit margins are or what the break even cost is. As long as enough people buy them then they would have a future (probably).

Quote:


The SAM board is a overpriced piece of crap. You'd rather have MorphOS ported to that thing??? Ummmm so you havent seen Piru's screenshot of MorphOS running on his MAC MINI??

The Mac Mini is much more powerful than the EFIKA and SAM + its alot cheaper. Anyone who doesnt see that needs to get their eyes checked.

On a similiar note.. If you couldnt get OS4 users who have bought NOTHING (read: no hardware, no OS4.x) to buy an EFIKA and use MOS for FREE then you're not going to get them to jump on it with a SAM board. Hopefully the big picture does not include trying to persuade OS4 users to use MOS when it should be the NEW users and "geeks" that wouldnt mind playing around with this using their MacMini.

-Alex

Quote:

The Efika is not more powerful than the SAM, but ahelluvalot cheaper! The price is its main feature, its main advantage.

The clock frequency of the SAM is a bit higher than the Efika but I doubt that you'd notice any benefit in overall performance. It's still an underpowered board for serious desktop usage. But compared to the Efika it's also terribly overpriced.

Quote:

Indeed! So it must be worth the effort for you to do it, right...?

Quote:

How do you come to that conclusion?

At that price I'd guess that they will sell between 50-200 boards in total, and 100% of them to die-hard OS4 supporters who gladly pays that kind of money for that kind of underspecced hardware just for the sake of running OS4.

But then what?

takemehomegrandma:
They will sell it to all them damn industrial customers!!!1111

Quote:

The reasons for porting to PPC Macs of all model types and any/all game consoles are to increase the size of the MorphOS user base, which is badly needed. The cost and availability of used PPC Macs makes them a good choice and their performance is far beyond the SAM (which is going nowhere and will be very short lived). I would like to see MOS on the PS3, but doubt it will happen as it will likely be too much work for too little gain.

Hopefully porting to PPC Macs will increase the number of users, increase sales of the OS and motivate the MOS team to then port the OS to more modern and cost effective hardware, what ever that may be.

Given how much some people will pay for antique Cyberstorm and Blizzard cards it was no surprise that ACube were overwhelmed with orders for Sam when they and Hyperion announced their OEM agreement for OS4.1

I am not aware of just how many orders that was and I'm not prepared to guess based on a single factor like price. As long as there is no single product that is supported by all the Amiga operating systems users are forced to choose one over the other or to spend money on an additional system for the sake of the OS that doesn't run on their existing hardware.

Having attempted to point out some reasons to port to Sam, I most certainly recognise the value of porting to PPC Macs. But I also wonder if some potential new MorphOS users will be turned off by having to source 2nd hand hardware despite how affordable it is.

Quote:

You tell me..

Would you rather spend 500-600$ for a SAM, or $265 for a ready-to-go EFIKA (PicoPSU, vid card, enclosure, hd)?

How about $300-$350 for a 1.4ghz G4 Mac Mini which whips both of those systems? I chose the EFIKA because it was cheap and works great but if MOS3 comes out for the MacMini, guess whats going on sale? Yea, the EFIKA.


-Alex

[ Edited by TheMagicM on 2008/9/28 19:16 ]

If I could I'd be running MorphOS on a G4 iBook or perhaps a G5 desktop system. But I'm someone that's never used a new computer (*) - I'm quite happy to trawl Oztion (the Australian equivalent of Ebay that doesn't screw it's members around with PayPal only policies) for bargains. But that's not necessarily something everyone else will do.

* Except for the Efika now that I think of it...

[ Edited by ausPPC on 2008/9/29 11:38 ]

Quote:

If you already have a SAM440 for AOS 4.1 would you not atleast try out MOS 2.1, propably yes? If you already have a SAM440 for OS 4.1 would you go and buy a Mac Mini to try out MOS 2.1, probably not?

Hi, this my first post here. I am a MorphOS's "hystory follower" but I haven't had the chance to become an user yet...

IMHO, a PS3 port would be too limited from the sony policy. Besides, MOS Dev Team isn't so big to give resources to the port.

Anyway, as the mac mini port is on his way, what are the remaining parts to do to complete it ? Is there a (obviously rough) estimated time to finish it ?

Quote:


How about reverse the situation. Lets say the SAM440 is for MorphOS and OS4 isnt ported to it....

If you already have a SAM440 for MOS, would you not at least try out OS4.1, probably yes?

No, I am a MorphOS user and do not care one bit about OS4 and whatever board it gets ported to.

If you already have a SAM440 for MOS would you go and buy a Mac Mini to try out MOS 3, probably not?

I dont know, I just screwed up and spent $600 on a underpowered/overpriced *motherboard* (not throwing in the price of the other hardware needed). So I'm pretty pissed about my original decision to buy a SAM board.


But I see what you're saying.. OS4.x users are all open-minded and they WANT to try MorphOS. (please read the heavy use of sarcasm). Again, I'm sure the goal isnt to convert OS4 users, instead, the real users (read: new users, geeks, tech folks) to the wonderful OS called MorphOS.

-Alex

Quote:

Using that logic, would you want to do a port for a board that will sell a few hundred at best and try to convert AOS4.x users that mostly hate MOS, or would it be better to port to a computer that has sold thousands, if not tens of thousands and those users have no negative attitudes toward MOS. Maybe 10% of 200-300 users, or 2% of 9,000-40,000 users. The math is pretty simple, even if my guesses are way off, the idea is still sound.

Porting to PPC Macs makes sense, porting to the SAM does not.

Well! I'm converted - sign me up for regular KoolAid injections and just give me a nudge to remind me to snarl at OS4 people if I forget.

So... Where can I buy a new PPC Mac?

Aaand where can I buy a new Sam?

I have nothing against AmigaOS4.x, or the users that prefer it, but I have seen the reverse of many many more AOS4.x users, or fans that are hostile toward anything to do with MorphOS at a ratio of about 25:1.

I looked closely at the SAM when AmigaOS4.1 was announced for it, with the initial thought of "what have I just done, spending my money on the EFIKA and registering MOS2.1?", but then saw the cost and weighed the differences and figured that even without having just bought an EFIKA, I probably would not have bought the SAM/AOS4.1 combo. But, then again, I might have if I had more money and there was no hope for either AOS4.x, or MOS3.x on a PPC Mac.

So, no need to get so sarcastic. You have your opinion for various reasons and I have mine, for my reasons. I am not trying to convert you, just making an argument for my reasoning, as you have made your arguments for your reasons.

I would have both possible paths continue, as competition is healthy to promote growth.

Quote:

I'd say you're in the minority being that you're an OS4 user and are actually open-minded. But hey, I guess I'm a hypocrite because I wouldnt give OS4 the time of day. Yea, I'm a MorphOS snob. With the knowledge, programming power and creativity on the MOS Dev team I'm just excited to see what they come up with next.


Quote:

I'd look in your local craigslist or ebay for a G4 Mac Mini. As for the SAM440, Acube sells it but I dont know their URL.


-Alex

Quote:
http://cgi.ebay.de/Apple-Mac-mini-Power-PC-G4-1-42-GHz-256-RAM-incl-Boxen_W0QQitemZ160287003077QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item160287003077&_trkparms=72%3A1239%7C39%3A1%7C66%3A2%7C65%3A12%7C240%3A1318&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14

That is a G4 1.42GHz including, case, harddisk, kbd, mouse, speakers.

Quote:

http://www.vesalia.de/d_sam440ep.htm

Wow - nearly double the price for a less than half clocked, L2 less mobo without hdd, case, psu, kbd, mouse.

Impressive!

I guess the arguemenmts are all pro Sam now!

|||

[ Edited by Velcro_SP 31.07.2011 - 03:09 ]

MorphOS on PPC Mac is going to be very cool and I look forward to seeing what it can do on a multi G5 system. But until OS4 finds it's way onto the same hardware, people who want to use both OSes will have to get two separate computers.

The other important point about Sam is that it's fresh off the production line unlike PPC Macs.

And, to be clear, I am not an OS4 user. But I do not accept the argument / assumption that any of the next-gen Amiga OSes is better or more correct than the other. That smells just like religious intollerance. If you need to fight, fight about something that matters.

Quote:

No one has said anything about MorphOS on all PPC Macs; only on Mac Mini. I don't know very much about Macs but the difference between motherboards must be huge.

MorphOS is not designed for a multiprocessor system (is it ?) so a dual G5 would mean one processor doing nothing.

Quote:

Why bring religion into it ? Someone who has spent several hundred Euros on a Sam plus 100 Euros on OS4 is not going to spend 150 Euros on MorphOS. Most people who wanted MorphOS on new hardware and didn't mind low power machines have bought EFIKA, so who are you targeting by porting to Sam ?

The differences between Hyperion's OS and MorphOS are getting more and more, you can't deny that. I don't see that as a problem. If OS4 gets some sparkly feature that everyone wants then MorphOS team will write their own version, result: everyone wins. There is still a lot of software that is available to both OSs too.

Perhaps MorphOS will find it's ways onto a G5 system, perhaps it won't. I still look forward to seeing it on a dual / quad / what-have-you G5.

Quote:

The mindset of mutual exclusivity isn't limited to those who attend whacky churches - it can be seen in politics, art and, sad to say, even science. It's the fuel of internet flame wars. I don't understand why choosing one OS over another is that important to some - especially when both are derived from the same parent.

After having decided that a computer and it's OS is worth spending money on, who knows what the user may do? If the distribution model for MorphOS remains as try-before-you-buy then MorphOS is a nice, low risk choice to at least investigate. Getting ever so slightly back on topic, as long as ACube are more cooperative than Sony, Sam is a better target than PS3. However, the energy is obviously behind PPC Mac which remains an interesting choice for the time being.

MorphOS3.5 on a dual G5 (quad core) PPC PowerMac at 2.7ghz (or was 3.0ghz the fastest of the last PPC PowerMac's produced?) would be a fantastic dream come true. With 4gb RAM, support for multiple graphics cards, USB2.0 and Firewire, a pair of 750gb SATA hdd's and a one or two DVD writing "SuperDrives" all at a price that I could pick up used on eBay or Craigslist for about the same price as a complete SAM440ep system that has only half the ports and hdd capacity and 1/8 the RAM.

Yeah, it would take a huge effort to complete the port of MorphOS and write all the drivers for all the devices and such, but it would be so faaaaaaassst. I know it is a dead end and there are only so many G5 Macs in the World and there won't be any more once they die, but it would be one helluva MorphOS machine!

I wonder how many G5 Macs were produced?

Quote:

Quark/qbox is, abox isn't - and never will be (trying to kludge that in will just cripple the OS beyond repair), as for a G5 the only "problem" will not just be "wasting" a CPU but also degrading its performance/capabilities in 32bit mode (the G5 performs badly enough against G4 to begin with)...


- CISC

How about a bounty to get the MorphOS team a G5 PowerMac ? Would they be interested ? Or perhaps a couple more Mac Minis ?

I would prefer to aim for new (available) hardware though.