Quote:
Senex wrote:
It's about the future, not the current state. Can't hurt to support that open-source approach, AROS, in parallel, too - who knows what might happen to MorphOS someday. Especially since they're back to being "just" a hobby OS as well.
Yeah, supporting AROS might make some sense in general. Can't see this though on a platform that sold less than 2000 times and already has an Amiga-like OS that goes far beyond AROS' 3.1-compatible goals. Maybe supporting MorphOS developers via some $$$ might be a better idea?
Quote:
And supporting AROS/PPC by bringing it to the Pegasos natively and implementing a wrapper for MorphOS applications can only be useful for pushing AROS further, making it easier for current 3rd party MorphOS developers to compile their stuff for AROS as well.
Again, what's the point in supporting AROS on PPC, when there's already MorphOS. MorphOS' future is not that uncertain as you make it sound like. The only point I can see is pushing AROS application portfolio (on PPC that is) with this (AROS X86 side will remain as unsupported as it is now). I doubt it will get any more attractive for the general user though.
Supporting AROS directly via AROS bounties on the AROS site (being platform unspecific) probably is the better the approach to get it to a useable state.