Not only Genesi appreciate Developers
  • Moderator
    hooligan
    Posts: 1948 from 2003/2/23
    From: Lahti, Finland
    Thats true.. check this out: http://www.tarmo.fi/arc/ballmer.avi
    www.mikseri.net/hooligan <- Free music
  • »12.09.04 - 08:38
    Profile Visit Website
  • Caterpillar
    Caterpillar
    Infinity
    Posts: 29 from 2003/5/7
    From: Hamburg / Germany
    ;o)
  • »12.09.04 - 08:45
    Profile Visit Website
  • Caterpillar
    Caterpillar
    Posts: 33 from 2003/6/17
    From: Muenster, Germany
    Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

    The guy reminds me to J. Goebbels.

    Sad but true.
    PegII, 512 MB Ram, Radeon 8500, NEC USB-Card
  • »12.09.04 - 10:05
    Profile
  • Paladin of the Pegasos
    Paladin of the Pegasos
    ThePlayer
    Posts: 1069 from 2003/3/24
    From: Hamburg/Germany
    What an ugly, crazy and sweating pig, running and jumping around! And yes he could do a great job as a Nazi PR guy!
    PowerMac G5 Quad 2.5 running UWQHD Resolution
  • »12.09.04 - 13:04
    Profile
  • Acolyte of the Butterfly
    Acolyte of the Butterfly
    ossian1961
    Posts: 123 from 2004/7/31
    From: Italy
    VERY DISGUSTING PIG FROM A VERY DISGUSTING FIRM! Death to microsoft!!! :-x :-x :-x :-x :-x
  • »12.09.04 - 16:00
    Profile Visit Website
  • Butterfly
    Butterfly
    Ronald
    Posts: 80 from 2004/3/17
    From: Québec
    He's my hero. :cry:
    - Ronald
  • »12.09.04 - 17:35
    Profile
  • News Moderator
    News Moderator
    Darth_X
    Posts: 571 from 2003/2/10
    From: Vancouver Isla...
    Quote:


    Ronald wrote:
    He's my hero. :cry:


    Steve Balmer? :-P




    I think something like MSDN Universal subscription would be great for the MorphOS market and greatly help developers new to the platform. :-D
    When you have eliminated all which is impossible,
    then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth!!! - Sherlock Holmes
  • »13.09.04 - 03:54
    Profile
  • News Moderator
    News Moderator
    Darth_X
    Posts: 571 from 2003/2/10
    From: Vancouver Isla...
    Which reminds me, Microsoft got their start by licensing an operating system to IBM. Maybe one day IBM will sell MorphOS with IBM powerPC based systems... :-D
    When you have eliminated all which is impossible,
    then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth!!! - Sherlock Holmes
  • »13.09.04 - 04:14
    Profile
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Posts: 979 from 2003/6/28
    @Darth_X

    We have MDC and is better ;)
  • »13.09.04 - 05:09
    Profile
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Crumb
    Posts: 732 from 2003/2/24
    From: aGaS & CUAZ Al...
    I think it's mandatory to start poll number #24857 inmediately to choose who in Genesi would motivate us more jumping, running and shouting "Developers!Developers!Developers!Developers!Developers!" ;-D
  • »13.09.04 - 07:59
    Profile Visit Website
  • Butterfly
    Butterfly
    ultraspec
    Posts: 94 from 2004/1/29
    I have a friend who watches this video constantly... I think he might be a little mental. Fortunately he is not at all in the IT field.

    That video and the other monkey video (Ballmer: Give it up for me!) are kind of scary to watch!
  • »13.09.04 - 22:18
    Profile Visit Website
  • Paladin of the Pegasos
    Paladin of the Pegasos
    Jupp3
    Posts: 1193 from 2003/2/24
    From: Helsinki, Finland
    Quote:

    Which reminds me, Microsoft got their start by licensing an operating system to IBM.

    Also remember that the "Microsoft Disk Operating System" or MS-DOS was based on QDOS, the "Quick and Dirty Operating System" written by Tim Paterson of Seattle Computer Products, for their prototype Intel 8086 based computer. :-)

    (I guess that "based on" means mostly "updated copyrights" :-) )
  • »14.09.04 - 17:30
    Profile Visit Website
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    td741
    Posts: 224 from 2003/4/2
    Well that was... disturbing...
    Steph
  • »14.09.04 - 18:02
    Profile Visit Website
  • Cocoon
    Cocoon
    Posts: 54 from 2004/6/16
    From: East Midlands, UK
    IIRC MS didn't actually own QDOS when they got the IBM contract, too.

    Digital Research reputedly missed out with DR-DOS because they weren't in when the IBM suits visited ...
    -~= Amiga Cats don't get Microsoft worms! =~-
  • »14.09.04 - 22:01
    Profile Visit Website
  • Butterfly
    Butterfly
    Ronald
    Posts: 80 from 2004/3/17
    From: Québec
    Quote:


    Darth_X wrote:
    Steve Balmer? :-P



    Both him and BillyG. :-)

    [ Edited by Ronald on 2004/9/15 0:58 ]
    - Ronald
  • »15.09.04 - 04:45
    Profile
  • Butterfly
    Butterfly
    tomjoad
    Posts: 99 from 2003/2/24
    Quote:


    Ronald wrote:
    Quote:


    Darth_X wrote:
    Steve Balmer? :-P



    Both him and BillyG. :-)



    *kablonk*

    Well, it's not strictly on-topic here but somehow related about Mickysoft companies and stupidity (so probably on-topic :-P). Anyway, the software company where I'm working is 100% MS blind followers. But the most stupid episode ever happened when I found out our "save" option could actually resulting in a loss of data without the user being aware of this immediately. All programs with similar save I found behaved differently so I wanted to file a bug report but before I did this I checked MS Office and lookathere ... same behaviour, also data loss possible if the user clicks wrong.

    For some weeks I said as a joke, they did it that way because MS would do this in Office. Guess what ... two days ago I happened to speak with the dev who implemented this and he said he'd consider this wrong too and had originally implemented this differently but the bosses told him to change this the Microsoft way - including risk of unintentional data loss. Because users would expect it to work like Office. :-o :-o

    Oh yeah, a user who has lost data in Office does expect the same from our program. PLEASE!!!

    This is :xxx:.

    Mom get me outta there
  • »15.09.04 - 16:46
    Profile
  • Moderator
    hooligan
    Posts: 1948 from 2003/2/23
    From: Lahti, Finland
    Well our Intranet doesnt work on anything else but Internet Explorer.
    Or it would, but it is deliberately inhibited.

    When I mailed the IT-department and asked why, the answer was that it's because of safety, and that I should uninstall Mozilla immediately.

    Safety... :-D :-o
    www.mikseri.net/hooligan <- Free music
  • »16.09.04 - 06:08
    Profile Visit Website
  • Paladin of the Pegasos
    Paladin of the Pegasos
    jcmarcos
    Posts: 1178 from 2003/3/13
    From: Pinto, Madrid ...
    To Tomjoad:

    Quote:

    I checked MS Office and lookathere ... same behaviour, also data loss possible if the user clicks wrong


    Could you please explain that behaviour briefly, if possible? I'm curious about it. If people feel pissed because of this request being off-topic, please remember, this whole thread is!

    To hooligan:

    Quote:

    Well our Intranet doesnt work on anything else but Internet Explorer.
    Or it would, but it is deliberately inhibited.


    Yes, I've also developed an intranet application which, unintentionally, only works on Internet Explorer 6. It's because I'm pushing the browser's abilities to the limits with some weird techniques.

    Quote:

    When I mailed the IT-department and asked why, the answer was that it's because of safety, and that I should uninstall Mozilla immediately.


    What an IT-department. Pfff...

    See ya!
  • »16.09.04 - 07:26
    Profile
  • Butterfly
    Butterfly
    tomjoad
    Posts: 99 from 2003/2/24
    Quote:

    Could you please explain that behaviour briefly, if possible? I'm curious about it.


    Sure.

    Just make up a little new document with formatting, shapes and everything in Word... then save to a format that does not support this fluff, e.g. plain text. You get a warning but that's it. The document name is changed to .txt and the document is marked as unmodified. Click on close (perhaps accidently) and everything non-text is gone without warning. IMHO a death sin - the content on screen does not in any way reflect the content of the file even though the document title claims so and it is marked as "unmodified" (file content and screen display should match then IMHO).

    Other programs, e.g. Photoshop behave differently (and in my opinion correctly) here. If you save in Photoshop to a file format that doesn't support some of the features you used, then the document is still dirty after save and the file name doesn't change either.

    I've lost some stuff while fiddling with our save, as I tried to press a toolbar button but accidently hit the close button which closed the document and gone was everything. In our software it's even worse than in Office, since there's good chance not even the "main" information of the document will remain (more than in Word, in our program this is rather an "export of a ***part*** of the document in ***greatly reduced quality***"). So you've got a good chance of ending up with a fraction of your data in bad quality.

    Quote:

    If people feel pissed because of this request being off-topic, please remember, this whole thread is!


    I think there's way too few off-topics here. I spend much more time on a German Mac forum than here, not for the fact that the Mac would be more interesting but rather because there's talk about God and the world and the most obscure off-topics I've ever seen :-D
  • »16.09.04 - 16:19
    Profile