Quote:
itix wrote:
What is default behaviour? I tried to google for an answer but found nothing. And is it the same in other desktops?
I just described default behaviour there: copy if destination is on a different filesystem, move if it's not. What it is on other desktops isn't really relevant.
Quote:
I didnt know you force Workbench to move files by pressing right command. Or was it to copy files? I already forgot.
Well, now you know.
Quote:
If I am using cut/copy/paste it always does what I want to.
Good for you, I suppose. I just find it akward and a relic of Win95 and thereabouts.
Quote:Quote:
Ah, I see - you obviously never moved on beyond OS3.1.
I know Workbench 3.5 added an abort button to copy/move operation. Does not change much, though.
Through hearsay, huh? Remeber that OS3.9 is more than 10 years old, 3.5 is what 13 years ago? And you use AmigaOS from 1994 to compare aganist. Yes, I know MorphOS devs tend to stick the nose in the sky and disqualify anything beyond 3.1 as "Hack&Patch crap", but some of the stuff was for the better, really. Get over it already.
Quote:
It still can not calculate MD5 checksum for you, it still can not retrieve version information for you
Valid points, it's nice that Ambient can show those in listers, and other meta data as well.
But when you copy a file with Ambient, and a file by that already exists, does it does it use those? From what I remember it just shows md5 sum, not versions. Do I remember wrong? Which is typically most usefull?
Quote:
it still does not have a toolbar
I'm not overly excited about the Ambient toolbar either, you know, I would prefer if I could configure it tighter, like DOpus does.
Quote:
you still can not enter path manually from a keyboard
You can hit hotkey for "execute command", type in path and enter, and the drawer of that path will open.
On a related note, in Ambient that shortcut doesnt work unless "toolbar" is shown. I would have seperated those, so that one can have the path gadget without having the toolbar row. Also I would very much prefer if the path gadget could _always_ be in "edit" mode, like they are in DOpus, I really dont see the point of those buttons.
Quote:
it can not even split long filenames properly to multiple lines
True, that's a nice feature.
Quote:
it still can not eject your DVD
If you remove "still" so that it's obvious that it is OS3.1 workbench you speak of, then true. For OS3.9, it is not quite true, since it comes with "BenchTrash" that ejects DVD/CDs if you drop their icons on it. In addition there are many ways to do it view the def icon and/or arexx interface of Workbench.
Quote:
lasso implementation is still blocking one
True, something it also shares with more "modern" desktops. On the other hand, Workbench can lasso icons from multiple sources at once.
Quote:
you still can not redefine keyboard shortcuts
Yes you can by changing language (or by editing catalog files)
Quote:
you still can not have bookmarks
I dont even use bookmarks in web browsers anymore, let alone on my desktops, but I dont see what prevents anyone from doing bookmarks via the arexx interface. I use scripts to save my Workbench in various "profiles" with given sets of drawers open, and that works nicely.
Quote:
and finally if you make a shortcut to the desktop its icon disappears from its target drawer.
Yes, I like that, that's a feature in my view, it's not a shortcut, it's the file itself. It's called to "leave it out" on Workbench. When you grab a fork from you kitchen drawer and leave it out on the desk, it does vanish from your drawer right? The "shortcut" thing i just yet another Win95 thing.
Quote:
Sorry to destroy your fond Amiga memories but Workbench is featureless program stuck in 1985 which was already outdated back in early 90s.
And Ambient isn't much better, allthough it has a few additional features that are nice. I started my rant here with lots of stuff that I find crap with Ambient, and naturally the knee-jerk reaction from MorphOS devs is to bring up Workbench as of 1994 for comparison. Well, it's not really impressing that Ambient of 2010 is somewhat more feature rich than a desktop that was more or less done in the eighties.
My initial complaint is that Ambient still is far from advanced enough... So it copied some concepts from Windows95, and it has a few features that makes it slightly better in some aspects than Workbench of 3.9 (which was done like 10 years ago), but it's still feels very much "under construction".
What ticks me off most though, is the attitude you show above, touting Ambient as sooo superior to anything else, when in reality it isn't.
And I'm not allone in using DOpus listers instead of Ambient listers.
And I really miss being able to tell Ambient drawer window to resize to fit the icons inside, and I hate how Ambient insists on resizing icons for no appearant reason. Whether to use toolbar or not, is a global choice when it should be something you can "snapshot" to the window of each path. Ditto for what file attributes to display, for example I want version strings to show when I browse system folders, but when I open a folder of ogg files I'd rather use the columns for other metadata. And.. and...
[ Edited by kolla on 2010/1/16 7:15 ]
[ Edited by kolla on 2010/1/16 7:15 ]
-- kolla