Quote:

I did not know that in a virtual machine that the NIC MAC address was also "conceived anyway". In that case, I suppose that both systems are essentially equal in difficulty.

Quote:

Quote:

Everyone (including AeonKit) knew from the beginning about the PA6T's situation, but bought into it nevertheless, with open eyes.

Quote:

Technically, you really only need one platform in order to write/test Radeon HD drivers.

Quote:

What's a CFE bug?

Quote:

Since the similarities between the Nemo and Cyrus are (AFAIK) virtually non-existent, it could very well be that the X5000 is a new experiment all over again...

> Freescale has [...] 20% higher clock

It's 2.0/1.8-1 = 11%.

> 30% cheaper

It's about 15%.

> Nemo is more expandable board

Yes, more RAM slots, SATA/PATA ports and USB ports.

> What's a CFE bug?

http://morph.zone/modules/newbb_plus/viewtopic.php?forum=3&topic_id=11372&start=211

Update:

> Leaman Computing Ltd. ("AmigaKit") is not A-Eon Technology Ltd.

"In order to bundle forces, A-EON Technology considers acquiring AmigaKit."
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=http://www.amiga-news.de/de/news/AN-2017-01-00060-DE.html

Update:

> Trevor has said in public (e.g. AmiWest 2012) that he indeed intends to recoup NRE costs
> with follow-up systems to the X1000.

Confirmation:

"He is aware that the price is high - but this is not due to the fact that A-EON Technology earns so much money with it, but by the fact that the production and development costs for hardware with low circulation are high."
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=http://www.amiga-news.de/de/news/AN-2017-01-00060-DE.html

> Can the X5000 (single core) decode and display 1080p x.264 streams in CPU/SW?

"The second case is FullHD movies. Practically it's impossible to play them without loss of FPS. [...] it's a little bit funny that we can't play FullHD videos."
http://www.amigapodcast.com/2017/04/amigaone-x5000-first-impression.html

Quote:

That may be an issue limited to OS4.
Who knows?

We will have to see when they get around to releasing MorphOS for the X5000.

Edit - Actually, after thinking about it, this will be problematic.
We simply shouldn't be decoding these streams with only the cpu.

[ Edited by Jim 24.04.2017 - 04:06 ]

Quote:

Only to a certain degree. The CPU lacks the grunt power, there is no way around that. The X1000 moved in 2005 G4 Powerbook realms concerning performance, and the G4 even won several benchmarks, that's well established. And the X5000 turned out to be a sideway move from the X1000 rather than a forward move.

So the above comment makes sense and is perfectly understandable.

Quote:

That's a different question altogether. The issue here wasn't how movie streams are potentially decoded the best way, but whether the CPU is powerful enough to do it.

This reminds me of the late Commodore days and thereafter, where the rest of the world (who already moved to powerful HW) began using mp3's and stuff. The Amiga was hopelessly behind. It lacked grunt power. But some enthusiasts persisted: "Untrue! The Amiga can of course also play mp3's! All you need is a HW decoder!"

Maybe *this* is the true "Amiga Curse"? The constant lack of powerful HW?

> That may be an issue limited to OS4. Who knows? We will have
> to see when they get around to releasing MorphOS for the X5000.

Or pampers, who we know is very willing to do whatever tests we demand of him on his MorphOS-driven X5000, could report here :-)

OK...I PM'd Wiktor.
Wish I had retained a direct email address, but its been a couple of years since I shipped him anything, and I no longer have access to the account I was using back then.

The P5020 ought to be right at the borderline for this kind of application.

I'd hate to find out that the X5000 can't do something a G5 can.

Although, it does sound like a potential application for ASMP, IF we have to keep discussing cpu driven decoding (which IS damned primitive).

[ Edited by Jim 24.04.2017 - 16:40 ]

> Wish I had retained a direct email address

http://morph.zone/modules/newbb_plus/viewtopic.php?topic_id=11881&forum=3&start=4 :-)

@Andreas

Thanks, email inquiry sent.
And I saved the email address.
I lost quite a few of those when I suddenly lost access to my Comcast e-mail account.

Quote:

What do you mean "find out"?!? This has been a known fact for how long now, a year? Two? Since its specs were first announced?

The X1000, X5000 and year 2005 Powerbook G4's are all in the same performance realm, roughly speaking. And that means about 720p x.264 streams (depending on clip/encoding). Back at the time, many were surprised by the poor performance of the PA6T compared to G4. In several benchmarks, the G4 won, despite the clock difference. But at least the PA6T had Altivec, like the G4. The only reason to why the X5000 cope with the other two, despite not having Altivec (which really helps applications like these) is probably because the higher clock frequency compensates the lack of it. But still, it's only 2GHz. The G5 however goes to 2.7GHz *and* it has Altivec. You see? On G5's, 1080p x.264 streams play at 2.3GHz I think I recall. At 2.5GHz for sure.

How is it possible that soeone like you, who posts so much about the splendidness of the X5000 all the time everywhere you go, didn't know about the X5000/G5 situation? It's not exactly news, you know? Do you ever listen to what others say?

Quote:

Sure, you could send the undecoded binary stream to a GPU and let it decode and show the film, or maybe to an Apple TV via AirPlay and hav it do exactly the same thing. Then you could say "Look, my X5000 can play 1080p streams." But the discussion here was about CPU performance, and whether the CPU was up for a task like this, or not. It turned out it wasn't. But G5's are!

>> it does sound like a potential application for ASMP, IF we have to
>> keep discussing cpu driven decoding (which IS damned primitive).

> the discussion here was about CPU performance, and whether the CPU
> was up for a task like this, or not.

I guess Jim's mention of ASMP refers to involving the 2nd CPU core.

Quote:

Thanks Andreas, at least you got that idea.
As to the P5020 being SO much worse than the G4, I really don't think that is the case, or I wouldn't be planning on buying one.
It has a clock speed advantage, and from the dmips figures posted should perform fairly well.
As to AltiVec, that's only a small group of routines, and the cpu still has a standard fpu.
Its definitely a better performer than the PA6T, and with the P5040's four cores it has the potential (via SMP or ASMP) of outperforming a G4 laptop by about 300%.

Further, the X5000 supports MODERN gpus. The best that will ever plug into an AGP G5 is a Radeon 3850 or 4650/70 (IF Bigfoot continues to support AGP variants of PCIe cards).

I'd like to see us one day have support for AMD GCN gpus.

And we need PCIe if we are going to support USB3 eventually, as PCI doesn't have the needed bandwidth.

Now, IF we could get support for the later PCIe G5s (like the Quad 2.5 GHz)...
Eh, I keep one around, just in case, but I'm not placing bets on that.

But we WILL have support for the X5000, and that DOES have advantages over our current hardware.

And, btw, I don't like the idea of wasting a huge part of my cpu power on video decoding when it could be done in alternative ways (even with a G5).
We ought to be able to display these streams on G4s.
Not being able to do so on processors that run as fast as 1.67 GHz doesn't make sense when, if these tasks were offloaded, the cpu would still have plenty of power to spare.

>> X5000 and year 2005 Powerbook G4's are all in the same performance realm

> As to the P5020 being SO much worse than the G4, I really don't think that is the case

I don't think "same performance realm" means "much worse".

> It has a clock speed advantage

Yes, that's what takemehomegrandma says makes up for its lack of AltiVec.

> AltiVec [is] only a small group of routines

Yes, but definitely of significant advantage for tasks like video decoding.

> I don't like the idea of wasting a huge part of my cpu power on video decoding

I'd love to waste the power of my 2nd CPU on video decoding. Currently, I'm wasting it on doing nothing at all ;-)

>I'd love to waste the power of my 2nd CPU on video decoding. Currently, I'm wasting it on doing nothing at all

That's not what I meant and you know it.

But we do have many systems now with an extra cpu to spare (even my G4 system has one completely unused), so why not?
If we are not implementing SMP, they are just sitting there.

Oh, another advantage of the P50X0 cpu?
DDR3 and much higher memory bandwidth, that will add to the performance advantage over G4s and help close the gap with G5s (the best G5s only offer DDR2).

And its a pity we may never see a PPC implementation designed for us with a cpu that supports DDR4.

Quote:
IIRC MPlaywer with Altivec gains about 15% speed over the non Altivec version.

Btw.: A shame the 864x Pegasos" didn't made it: Not the major bottle neck of existing G4 systems (slow bus), but with low wattage and optionally with two cores. An 8610 (single core, 1.3GHz, NEC "redtail" (IIRC) board) was even shown to decode FullHD. Chance missed and gone many years ago. And since these chances are long gone I massively advocate since a couple of years the ISA switch to x64. PPC is dead, I cried some tears for it, but eventually you need to look forward then. MorphOS on i7 or Ryzen.. stop it, i am wetting my pants!

Quote:

On MorphOS it's used more than you perhaps may think, but for stuff being discussed here (video encoding/decoding, rendering, etc) it is a big and important performance booster.


Quote:

If I interpret Andreas Wolf's benchmarks above, it says that the X5000 has a slight upper hand for most (non-SIMD) integer operations. For floating point and memory speed, it seems to be the other way round. And SIMD, Floating Point and memory are kind of essential for many day to day things, like codecs encoding/decoding and other "multimedia" situations, not to mention rendering, image processing, etc.

And then the G5 has the benefit of much higher clock frequencies on top of it all, so...

You may of course like/want an X5000 for several reasons, and you may even prefer it over a G5 system for some reasons as well. But I don't see how the X5000 wins over G5's in performance, I don't see how it would be a "G5 killer".

And then you factor in the price in the equation...

Looking at it through 2017-glasses, I'd say the X5000 is about on par with all other PPC stuff from more than a decade ago. Who cares what is slightly faster or slower in one or another area of measurement, when the situation in total is so off the charts behind? The rest of the world moved several dimensions ahead since these performance levels at all were relevant in desktop computing.

Here we are now, looking at how G4's and X1000 and X5000 can decode 720p x.264 streams, and the G5 can do it in 1080p. While the rest of the world is at 4k and x.265. My phone films in 4k. All films of my children, family activities etc. You know. It's everyday stuff now, not science fiction. My next monitor will be 4k. 720p isn't really funny then.

Of course there are better/smarter ways to decode video streams, by letting the GPU offload the CPU for example. But the need for CPU grunt power doesn't go away. It's still needed for a lot of other things in everyday computing. PPC is hopelessly left dimensions behind.

In my eyes, the move to x64 is urgent.

I've never disagreed with either of you two on that point, and the fact is WE are apparently moving to X64.

When and how long it will take to complete is anyone's guess, but that journey has started, so we are one up on the competition.

And we have, or will have, systems that represent about the best that we can get with this ISA.
Two things I'd still like to see happen, the T2080 laptop and a port of MorphOS to PCIe PowerMac G5s.

One thing I see NO point in what so ever is Tabor. Why would I want to invest any money in that much of a downgrade?

And yes, the cpu in the X5000 isn't anything but a lateral move, at least in terms of power. Its really the other elements of the e5500 and e6500 cored cpus Soc that drive my interest. PCIe, higher bandwidth memory, (somewhat) faster SATA, etc.

As to video decoding, if we aren't going to adopt gpu assisted decoding (which would vary somewhat with each gpu), there are decoding ICs available for both PCI and PCIe applications that drivers could be written for.

I just don't see the point in using 70-100% of our available cpu power on one task.
Not when the demands on a Linux, Windows, or MacOS system are so much lower.

>>> another advantage of the P50X0 cpu? DDR3 and much higher memory bandwidth,
>>> that will [...] help close the gap with G5s (the best G5s only offer DDR2).

>> If I interpret Andreas Wolf's benchmarks above, it says that the X5000 has
>> a slight upper hand for most (non-SIMD) integer operations. For floating
>> point and memory speed, it seems to be the other way round.

> Its really the other elements of the e5500 and e6500 cored cpus Soc that drive
> my interest. PCIe, higher bandwidth memory, (somewhat) faster SATA, etc.

Regarding memory performance, my G5 clearly destroys the X5000 as can be seen from the benchmarks in this thread, despite what's written on spec papers.

> there are decoding ICs available for both PCI and PCIe applications that drivers
> could be written for.

Indeed, but I'd still favour an ASMP solution to keep my 2nd CPU from feeling bored. After all, it is unremovably sitting there constantly drawing current and creating heat. I'd consider using a dedicated expansion card for video decoding (or transcoding) an option as soon as MorphOS supports switching off (or power saving modes for) the 2nd G5 CPU.

> I just don't see the point in using 70-100% of our available cpu power on one task.

I don't have a problem with that, especially if it's spare CPU power anyway.

Quote:

Big shocker there!

I think you are the only one here who liked to claim they were 2 completely unrelated companies

Quote:

Well, they say that you can safely pull it out (as long as CPU in socket A stays in place)...