ARM for the future?
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12081 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    >> Do you think the Cortex-A57 will be introduced with a clock rate below 2.1 GHz?

    > whether it will make it to (or above) 2.1 is questionable.

    No Dhrystone, but more real-world comparison by ARM Ltd. between Cortex-A57 and Cortex-A15:

    http://www.arm.com/images/A57performance_webpage.png
  • »27.12.13 - 03:51
    Profile
  • Jim
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Jim
    Posts: 4977 from 2009/1/28
    From: Delaware, USA
    Yep, pretty vague.

    But it looks like 64 bit will do OK.
    The jump is not that surprising considering the difference between the A9 and the A15.
    And the A9 is no slouch.
    "Never attribute to malice what can more readily explained by incompetence"
  • »27.12.13 - 04:51
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12081 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    Update:

    > Denver in 2015:
    > https://morph.zone/modules/newbb_plus/viewtopic.php?topic_id=8783&forum=3&start=54

    ...or even in 2014 with Tegra K1 ("Tegra 5", "Logan") still?

    "Tegra K1 is offered in two pin-to-pin compatible versions. [...] The second version uses a custom, NVIDIA-designed 64-bit dual Super Core CPU. This CPU (codenamed "Denver") delivers very high single-thread and multi-thread performance. It is based on the ARMv8 architecture [...]. [...] the 64-bit version is expected in devices in the second half of the year."
    http://nvidianews.nvidia.com/Releases/NVIDIA-Unveils-Tegra-K1-a-192-Core-Super-Chip-That-Brings-DNA-of-World-s-Fastest-GPU-to-Mobile-a8a.aspx

    "The Denver cores (and the rest of the SoC) are fabricated on TSMC’s 28nm HPM process and be clocked at up to 2.5GHz."
    http://www.extremetech.com/computing/174023-tegra-k1-64-bit-denver-core-analysis-are-nvidias-x86-efforts-hidden-within
  • »07.01.14 - 12:45
    Profile
  • Jim
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Jim
    Posts: 4977 from 2009/1/28
    From: Delaware, USA
    Well Andreas,
    It promises to be an interesting year.
    Curiously enough, some PPCs will still hold an edge over even the latest ARM designs (in particular in the number of threads possible).
    But with these two jumps, 64 bit and higher clock speeds, the ARM ISA is finally starting to be really competitive with other mainstream ISAs.
    "Never attribute to malice what can more readily explained by incompetence"
  • »07.01.14 - 15:43
    Profile
  • vox
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    vox
    Posts: 524 from 2003/11/25
    From: Belgrade
    Quote:

    takemehomegrandma wrote:
    Quote:


    Zylesea wrote:
    @ takemehomegrandma

    Pity Genesi is rather a mouse than an elephant.


    They may be small, but they are always looking for big friends. Pegatron, the now spun off (?) development company of Asus, was heavily involved in the smartbook/smarttop products, and they have a great relationship with Freescale themselves: http://www.freescale.com/genesi

    Quote:

    nVidia with MS can break wintel. Maybe in future we will have Wintel and "Windia".


    WINTEL -> "WARM"

    ;-)




    Dear THM, its good to hear overall good news that PPC isn`t that as dudo, as many have claimed and laughed. Its not faster player too, but let it become better.

    Surely, that doesn`t mean ANYTHING automatically until we support some CPU and MOS needs to add AMCC now and maybe Freescale soon (so X2000 should be a viable target too ... ).

    I really like ARMs but was bitterly dissapointed that dual core Prestigio tablet was unable to drive Linux and Android 4.x is ... just not for me.

    ARM is the future, and M$ supporting another ISA after WinNT PPC/MIPS is a clear sign of change. Once Office goes Linux, M$ will be more widespread.

    Only good news is that Windows 8.x is a complete disaster - a mobile phone OS offered to desktops. That is shoot in a foot at least for I.

    AS of MOS supporting AMCC, even PWREfficient, dual core G5 and Freescale while doing the ARM transition would be my suggestion. And not because I am ex-OS4 user, but because that strenghtens MOS. OK?
    ------------------------------------------
    iMac G5 1GB with MorphOS and MacOS X
    Lame PC with AmiKit XE
    YT channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdHl_msNWHEVPf229h_gijQ
    Telegram Amiga group: https://t.me/amigaranchorelaxo
  • »07.01.14 - 17:23
    Profile
  • Jim
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Jim
    Posts: 4977 from 2009/1/28
    From: Delaware, USA
    Quote:

    vox wrote:
    AS of MOS supporting AMCC, even PWREfficient, dual core G5 and Freescale while doing the ARM transition would be my suggestion. And not because I am ex-OS4 user, but because that strenghtens MOS. OK?



    He is actually correct on this.
    Strengthening our current system would have advantages.
    I for one, am tired of the 'hobbyist OS" label.
    I can already do most of my work from a MorphOS machine.
    An alternative box could use the unused cores and memory that we already have at our disposal.
    "Never attribute to malice what can more readily explained by incompetence"
  • »07.01.14 - 17:55
    Profile
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    minator
    Posts: 365 from 2003/3/28
    So it begins.

    4 to 8 A57 cores >= 2GHz
    8 x SATA3
    2 x PCIe 3 x4 slots (or 1 x x8)
    Up to 128GB DDR3/4 RAM
    Micro ATX
  • »28.01.14 - 22:30
    Profile Visit Website
  • Jim
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Jim
    Posts: 4977 from 2009/1/28
    From: Delaware, USA
    Except for the limited expansion, that is nice.
    "Never attribute to malice what can more readily explained by incompetence"
  • »29.01.14 - 00:03
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12081 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    Update:

    > Freescale going Cortex-A53 for i.MX (and Cortex-A57 for QorIQ):
    > http://media.freescale.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=196520&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1789227
    > Maybe they'll simply skip Cortex-A15 for i.MX?

    Indeed they will (and also Cortex-A12 for that matter). Next after current i.MX6 with Cortex-A9 will be i.MX7 with Cortex-A7 and then i.MX8 with Cortex-A53:

    http://www.freescale.com/files/training/doc/dwf/DWF13_APF_CON_T0838.pdf (pages 3 to 5)
  • »11.02.14 - 12:20
    Profile
  • Butterfly
    Butterfly
    scrAb_
    Posts: 62 from 2010/7/23
    Now I get a little bit confused....ARM is relasing planning Cortex-A17 (over A12) ...


    ....ok..A12 has no big.LITTLE...

    [ Edited by scrAb_ 11.02.2014 - 13:06 ]
    MacMini@1.5Ghz 1GB/DualBoot Morphos3.1/DebianPPC - Efika MX sb
    PowerBook 5,9
  • »11.02.14 - 13:01
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12081 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    Update:

    > New list of DMIPS per MHz and core figures (added Cortex-A12 and specified
    > different Krait types)

    Figures for Cortex-A12 and Cortex-A15 substantiated and figures for Cortex-A17 added (all according to AnandTech):

    ARM Cortex-A7: 1.9
    ARM Cortex-A8: 2.0
    Qualcomm Scorpion: 2.1
    ARM Cortex-A53: 2.3
    Marvell Sheeva PJ4: 2.4
    ARM Cortex-A9: 2.5
    Marvell Sheeva PJ4B: 2.6
    Qualcomm Krait 200: 3.1...3.3 (depending on source)
    Qualcomm Krait: 3.3
    Qualcomm Krait 300: 3.4
    ARM Cortex-A12: 3.0...3.5 (depending on source)
    Qualcomm Krait 400: 3.4...3.6 (depending on source)
    Qualcomm Krait 450: 3.5
    Broadcom Brahma15: 3.5 (unsure whether or not this core is just ARM Cortex-A15)
    Apple Swift: 3.5
    ARM Cortex-A15: 3.5...4.0 (depending on source)
    ARM Cortex-A17: 4.0
    Applied Micro Potenza: 4.2
    ARM Cortex-A57: 4.1...4.8 (depending on implementation)
    ARM Cortex-A72: 4.7...5.0 (depending on implementation)

    Does anybody have DMIPS figures for the Apple Cyclone or the Applied Micro X-Gene?


    Edit: now also taking these into account:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_ARMv7-A_cores
    Edit2: added Cortex-A72
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_ARMv8-A_cores
    Edit3: added X-Gene
    Edit4: renamed X-Gene as Potenza

    [ Edited by Andreas_Wolf 23.04.2016 - 11:07 ]
  • »11.02.14 - 19:51
    Profile
  • Visitor
  • use the white enamel of Limoges Limoges a step by step drawing a pattern, this step also requires six to eight different The roasting process. Making this watch enamel painting takes nearly 40 hours. Master enamel white gradient but also by projecting shadows and contrast replica audemars piguet millenary watches , pondering the light changes cheap rolex watches , the three-dimensional shape pattern. Ronde Louis Cartier watch horse decor, oversized watches, monochrome Micro-painted enamel Case: 18K rhodium-plated white K gold, set with 61 brilliant-cut round diamonds, diamonds total weight of 1.57 karats Crown: circular-grained crown , set with a diamond dial: 18K white K gold, monochrome Micro-painted enamel decoration horse Strap: semi-matte black alligator strap Clasp: 18K rhodium-plated white K gold folding clasp set with 43 brilliant-cut round diamond, diamonds total weight of 0.42 karats Water depth: 30 meters / 100 feet / 3 bar Movement: Cartier 430 MC-type workshop refined manual winding mechanical movement numbered and limited edition 80 straw marquetry inlaid decorative lion watches ? fake montblanc villeret watches in This section of straw marquetry inlay watch, Cartier Arizona straw this special material to show heroic lion. Straw silky luster with warm tones and showed lion mane subtle color gradients, make it shine. Straw is a superior gloss steadily split, then press roller Flattening, then fine wood carvings sawing open, and finally arranged side by side, a combination of design patterns fake rolex submariner watches . Natural Straw has from golden yellow to reddish brown in six different colors, through the perspective techniques and creative cut, draw dignified and noble lion pattern. Although straw watchmaking rare material, but because of their delicate texture and unique toughness in two years ago by Cartier bold use to create a variety of watches masterpiece replica breitling chronomat watches .
  • »12.02.14 - 05:59
  • Visitor
  • Louboutin for sale, fake watches for sale tariffs will likely be instantly transferred towards the PHS 3G account. China Telecom Shanghai yesterday to a reporter inquired about issues associated for the organization was knowledgeable that,Chrsitian Louboutin Attractive Sling Glittered Stiletto Nude, as at current,wholesale, China Telecom hasn't but acquired authorities departments around the wants of PHS people in January one 2013 for processes for withdrawal network needs. China Telecom because the backbone from the nationwide substantial telecommunications corporations,Christian louboutin outlets, will carry on to create PHS buyer services and retain the reliable rights and interests of customers of PHS network.discovered the PHS small business isn't only the operation of China Telecom,Louboutin sales and profits, China Unicom also operates connected companies inside the north, watches replica Christian Louboutin Yolanda Spikes 120 leather peep toe pumps, replica rolex the PHS have to totally withdraw in the marketplace deployment of nationwide unity.October of this 12 months,
  • »12.02.14 - 05:59
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    minator
    Posts: 365 from 2003/3/28
    Quote:

    Andreas_Wolf wrote:
    Update:

    > New list of DMIPS per MHz and core figures (added Cortex-A12 and specified
    > different Krait types)

    Figures for Cortex-A12 and Cortex-A15 substantiated and figures for Cortex-A17 added (all according to AnandTech):

    ARM Cortex-A17: 4.0


    That figure is probably wrong and appears to have been made up. The A17 is faster than the A12 but DMIPS won't be the best benchmark to show it.

    Quote:

    Does anybody have DMIPS figures for the Apple Cyclone or the Applied Micro X-Gene?


    No idea but I've seen both compared to Haswell in performance per clock.
  • »17.02.14 - 20:34
    Profile Visit Website
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12081 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    Update:

    > Core roadmap [...] shows [...] the e6501 core (adding virtualization interrupts) for 2013/2014

    First product with e6501 core announced:

    http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code=B3421
    http://media.freescale.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=196520&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1900438
  • »18.02.14 - 00:26
    Profile
  • Jim
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Jim
    Posts: 4977 from 2009/1/28
    From: Delaware, USA
    A PPC for the 4G market?
    I am confused as to the market for this component.
    "Never attribute to malice what can more readily explained by incompetence"
  • »18.02.14 - 02:27
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12081 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    > A PPC for the 4G market? I am confused as to the market for this component.

    We already talked about the QorIQ Qonverge there:

    https://morph.zone/modules/newbb_plus/viewtopic.php?forum=11&topic_id=8901&start=27

    More reading material:

    http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/overview.jsp?code=SRVCPROV
    http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/overview.jsp?code=QORIQ_QONVERGE
    http://www.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/brochure/BRSMALLCELLS.pdf
    http://www.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/white_paper/QORIQQONVERGEWP.pdf
    http://www.freescale.com/files/rf_if/doc/white_paper/SMCELLRFWP.pdf
    http://www.freescale.com/files/industrial/doc/brochure/ENEAUPDTCSTY.pdf
    http://www.freescale.com/files/training/doc/dwf/DWF13_JNK_NET_T0991.pdf

    In short, the QorIQ Qonverge is a series of base station-on-chips for the wireless infrastructure service provider market.
  • »18.02.14 - 09:40
    Profile
  • Jim
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Jim
    Posts: 4977 from 2009/1/28
    From: Delaware, USA
    Thanks Andrea, I remember the e6500 cored processor, and this new core is interesting.
    I wonder what other purposes the DSPs could be used for.

    BTW - Surprisingly good results on the A53.
    I could still see this going solo.

    [ Edited by Jim 18.02.2014 - 09:21 ]
    "Never attribute to malice what can more readily explained by incompetence"
  • »18.02.14 - 10:04
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12081 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    > I wonder what other purposes the DSPs could be used for.

    I'd say anything DSPs are suited for in general, for instance audio and video processing.

    > Surprisingly good results on the A53.

    You mean its Dhrystone performance per clock located between Cortex-A8 and Cortex-A9?

    > I could still see this going solo.

    So can others:

    https://morph.zone/modules/newbb_plus/viewtopic.php?forum=3&topic_id=9647&start=37
  • »18.02.14 - 12:28
    Profile
  • Jim
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Jim
    Posts: 4977 from 2009/1/28
    From: Delaware, USA
    >You mean its Dhrystone performance per clock located between Cortex-A8 and Cortex-A9?

    Yes, exactly, I should not be so brief with my messages.

    A 64bit cpu with better than A8 performance and low power draw could definitely find a market.
    Imagine what a product with 8, 16, 32GBs or more of memory could do.
    "Never attribute to malice what can more readily explained by incompetence"
  • »18.02.14 - 13:19
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12081 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    > 64bit cpu with better than A8 performance

    As this link shows for other benchmarks than Dhrystone, the per-clock performance of Cortex-A53 is even slightly above that of Cortex-A9.
  • »18.02.14 - 15:21
    Profile
  • Jim
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Jim
    Posts: 4977 from 2009/1/28
    From: Delaware, USA
    Damn, that is better than I expected.
    Have you noticed that new ARM introductions tend to be more impressive than expected.
    I never anticipated the large jump from A9 to A15.
    "Never attribute to malice what can more readily explained by incompetence"
  • »18.02.14 - 17:38
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12081 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    > AFAIK most ARM CPU's are bi-endian. At least I think that's the case with ARMv7/Cortex

    After half a decade of assumptions, speculation and guesswork here on MorphZone, I think I found the definite answer on the question of ARM's endianness using these references:

    http://translatedcode.wordpress.com/2012/04/02/this-end-up/
    http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0203g/Chddgffb.html

    The gist of it is that ARM knows one little-endian mode (on both data and code level, aka true little-endian) and two big-endian modes: BE32 and BE8. BE32 is big endianness on both data and code level (aka true big-endian), whereas BE8 is data-only big endianness.

    BE32 is supported by:
    - ARMv4
    - ARMv5
    - ARMv6

    BE8 is supported by:
    - ARMv6
    - ARMv7
    - ARMv8
  • »21.02.14 - 14:21
    Profile
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Zylesea
    Posts: 2053 from 2003/6/4
    Quote:

    Andreas_Wolf schrieb:
    > AFAIK most ARM CPU's are bi-endian. At least I think that's the case with ARMv7/Cortex

    After half a decade of assumptions, speculation and guesswork here on MorphZone, I think I found the definite answer on the question of ARM's endianness using these references:

    http://translatedcode.wordpress.com/2012/04/02/this-end-up/
    http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0203g/Chddgffb.html

    The gist of it is that ARM knows one little-endian mode (on both data and code level, aka true little-endian) and two big-endian modes: BE32 and BE8. BE32 is big endianness on both data and code level (aka true big-endian), whereas BE8 is data-only big endianness.

    BE32 is supported by:
    - ARMv4
    - ARMv5
    - ARMv6

    BE8 is supported by:
    - ARMv6
    - ARMv7
    - ARMv8


    Andreas, you're the man! Good find. I almost gave up about that issue.
    The beefier ARMs hence don't have the benefit of an easier to accomplish binary compability.

    The Raspberry pi however is ARMv6 based....
    --
    http://via.bckrs.de

    Whenever you're sad just remember the world is 4.543 billion years old and you somehow managed to exist at the same time as David Bowie.
    ...and Matthias , my friend - RIP
  • »21.02.14 - 22:37
    Profile Visit Website
  • Moderator
    Kronos
    Posts: 2240 from 2003/2/24
    Quote:

    Zylesea wrote:

    The beefier ARMs hence don't have the benefit of an easier to accomplish binary compability.





    Don't really see the problem here (or I failed to understand the linked text).

    BE8 would still allow all system-structures to be 1:1 copies of 68k/PPC ones.

    All data handled by an app internally can also be BE8 without problem.

    The only thing we would need is an elf-loader making sure it load code-segments as LE and data-segments as BE (which I assume would be trivial).

    Same for an 68k or PPC EMU, all data is BE and so is all legacy code (which is just data for the EMU), only the snippets of ARM-code it wants executed have to loaded a LE.
  • »21.02.14 - 23:13
    Profile