How about SFS?
  • MorphOS Developer
    jacadcaps
    Posts: 1753 from 2003/3/5
    From: Poland
    Strohmeyer's SFS versions are indeed not recommended. Better stick with good old working 68k SFS and the PPC one included with MorphOS.
  • »19.02.08 - 08:00
    Profile Visit Website
  • Acolyte of the Butterfly
    Acolyte of the Butterfly
    Solo_Kazuki
    Posts: 108 from 2006/7/24
    From: Universe:Milky...
    Well.. i had some time ago SFS 68k version, and i had some problems, e.g. when i/o access to HD was very intensive, thre was too big processor usage (probably because it's JIT emulation). In short - with SFS 68k You can't get as good transfer as with MOS version. e.g. Robin Hood (at least demo) was much slower because of intensive HD access.
  • »19.02.08 - 13:02
    Profile Visit Website
  • MorphOS Developer
    jacadcaps
    Posts: 1753 from 2003/3/5
    From: Poland
    That's pretty obviouis since 68k is **surprise** emulated.
  • »19.02.08 - 13:29
    Profile Visit Website
  • Acolyte of the Butterfly
    Acolyte of the Butterfly
    Solo_Kazuki
    Posts: 108 from 2006/7/24
    From: Universe:Milky...
    As You can see in this thread, it isn't obvious for everyone... ;)
  • »20.02.08 - 16:34
    Profile Visit Website
  • Paladin of the Pegasos
    Paladin of the Pegasos
    Jupp3
    Posts: 1192 from 2003/2/24
    From: Helsinki, Finland
    Emulated, unofficial branch with no guarantee for compatibility with the official branch (now or in the future)

    That should be enough to convince people to avoid it.

    Also remember that "bigger version number" doesn't always mean "has significant bugfixes and/or new features". And when comparing two totally separate branches, you really can't compare different releases only by their version numbers.

    [ Edited by Jupp3 on 2008/2/22 11:01 ]
  • »22.02.08 - 08:39
    Profile Visit Website