Windows running on MOS
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    Everblue
    Posts: 167 from 2004/1/6
    Hi,

    In the gallery there is a screengrab of Windows `98 running in Morph OS - I am pondering getting a Pegasos II and although I am not really in interested in windows, due to the nature of some programs I will be forced to use Windows programs. So for the questions:

    - Which Windows OS is it possible to Run in Morph OS? Just Windows 98, or Win ME, or perhaps Windows 2000 as well?

    - I imagine that it is done through the emulation of a x86 machine?

    - How fast does it run, on say, Pegasos II with G3 processor?

    Thanks a lot!


    Everblue...

    BTW, Is Amiga OS4 release for Pegasos 2 official?
  • »24.02.04 - 07:07
    Profile
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Tcheko
    Posts: 534 from 2003/2/25
    From: France
    FYI :

    http://lwn.net/2001/1213/a/bochs.php3

    and

    http://bochs.sourceforge.net/

    No idea of speed. Shall ask to macos users.

    Tcheko.

    PS : AOS4? No idea. MOS's enough for me.
    Quelque soit le chemin que tu prendras dans la vie, sache que tu auras des ampoules aux pieds.
    -------
    I need to practice my Kung Fu.
  • »24.02.04 - 07:42
    Profile Visit Website
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    Everblue
    Posts: 167 from 2004/1/6
    Thanks a lot for the information - that was very helpful.
  • »24.02.04 - 07:52
    Profile
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Spidey
    Posts: 568 from 2003/2/24
    From: Netherlands
    Hello Everblue,

    - Which Windows OS is it possible to Run in Morph OS? Just Windows 98, or Win ME, or perhaps Windows 2000 as well?
    Win95, Win98, WinME, NT4. Win2000 I don't recall anybody mentioning this. Just try it :-)

    - I imagine that it is done through the emulation of a x86 machine?
    This on already answered by Tcheko. The emu-prog Bochs can be downloaded from the FTP-site. I'm busy making a manual how to install Bochs and so on.

    - How fast does it run, on say, Pegasos II with G3 processor?
    This is covered in a few threads. Just type in 'Bochs' in the MorphZone search engine and it will show the right thread :-)


    Downside at this moment:
    - No ethernet connection
    - No GFX-support, so you've got only your 640x480x16 screen to work with
    - No printer support
    - Audio?? I believe also no audio :-?

    Upside: :-)
    - You can run MS Office and work with your Word-docs
    - Uuh, laugh at the inefficient OS and switch back to Ambient?? :-D

    Just kidding ofcourse.

    Hope this was (afterall) usefull for you. :-)

    Bye,

    Spidey
  • »24.02.04 - 08:00
    Profile Visit Website
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    dholm
    Posts: 296 from 2003/9/1
    From: Malmo, Sweden
    I've built a Bochs 2.1.1 binary but I haven't got any place where I can upload it.

    2.1.1 has a ton of updates, one of them being proper VBE support. You will be able to run win9x in high resolutions using SciTech Display Doctor 7.

    As for speed. Bochs isn't fast. It has not been designed to be fast. Bochs is targeted at x86 OS-developers and is therefore intended to work as a testing ground for new systems. Therefore it doesn't make intelligent optimisations that would break debugging support etc.

    There is a new emulator called QEMU available (not for MOS yet though) that is a bit faster. Still, it cuts too many corners to be really fast. On my Pegasos II/G4 I get about the same speed (using simple benchmarks) that you would expect on a 70-90MHz Pentium.
  • »24.02.04 - 13:20
    Profile Visit Website
  • jah
  • Butterfly
    Butterfly
    jah
    Posts: 69 from 2003/3/24
    about the speed :
    peg1 g3-600 here

    the only thing i would use windows for is deacing newer.ace files
    which report "unsupported compression" with open source unace

    unfortunately it is impossible with bochs+w98
    it is much too slow, unacing a cd iso would need sereval days
  • »24.02.04 - 13:43
    Profile Visit Website
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    dholm
    Posts: 296 from 2003/9/1
    From: Malmo, Sweden
    There exists a Linux/x86 binary of unace which support these newer ace formats. You could try running that using the qemu-fast mode under Linux.

    qemu-fast allows you to execute Linux/x86 binaries on any platform. It works quite well.
    There is a version of QEMU in Gentoo portage. Newer ebuilds are available through http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero

    If you are not using Gentoo and there is no QEMU version available on the Linux you are using you can get it here: http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/

    If you do not have Linux at all I'm afraid I can't give you any hints. Maybe you could bring the file to a friend for uncompression?
  • »24.02.04 - 14:01
    Profile Visit Website
  • Acolyte of the Butterfly
    Acolyte of the Butterfly
    Estrayk
    Posts: 142 from 2003/12/30
    From: Spain!
    What about DosBox ?
    http://www.ppa.ltd.pl/software/download/DOSBox.lha

    I havent tested but some maybe is more faster that Bochs.
    Config: PegasosII G4/1000, 256MB DDR400, VooDoo 3000 AGP
  • »24.02.04 - 14:15
    Profile Visit Website
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    dholm
    Posts: 296 from 2003/9/1
    From: Malmo, Sweden
    I haven't used DOSBox that much but I doubt that it is faster than Bochs because it uses the exact same emulation method (interpreting CPU-core).
    BUT, it might actually be a good way of using UnACE as it boots into a simple DOS-clone which means you haven't wait all day for it to boot and it won't run a lot of stupid processes in the background like windows does.
  • »24.02.04 - 14:18
    Profile Visit Website
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    Posts: 159 from 2003/10/24
    From: Portland Orego...
    DOSBox was meant to run only real mode programs 286/386. It won't run windows (atleast not 95 and up don't know about 1.0 - 3.1). And still has some BIG issues under MOS native version.

    [Edit]
    Sorry I wrote this before I saw the new version was available.
    --Mithalas
  • »24.02.04 - 14:43
    Profile
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    dholm
    Posts: 296 from 2003/9/1
    From: Malmo, Sweden
    Actually the latest release (or was it CVS) supports protected mode. However, it probably doesn't run windows. Is UnACE a win32 binary though?

    BTW, real-mode is not someting specific to 80286/80386. 80286-80686 all support both real-mode and protected mode.
  • »24.02.04 - 14:47
    Profile Visit Website
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Zylesea
    Posts: 2057 from 2003/6/4
    --
    http://via.bckrs.de

    Whenever you're sad just remember the world is 4.543 billion years old and you somehow managed to exist at the same time as David Bowie.
    ...and Matthias , my friend - RIP
  • »24.02.04 - 15:29
    Profile Visit Website
  • Caterpillar
    Caterpillar
    docgeddy
    Posts: 37 from 2003/7/31
    How about FreeDOS ?
    ---

    DocGeddy

    Member of Butterfly Army
  • »24.02.04 - 17:25
    Profile
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    td741
    Posts: 224 from 2003/4/2
    Tried to play with PCTask (3.x)

    It doesn't seem to work with my catweasel floppies.

    There were some harddisk files included with PCTask 3 (included on a CU Amiga (or was it Amiga Format) cover CD). I can't seem to boot from those hardfiles, but I'm unsure if it actually was a bootable hardfile anyway. Or maybe PCTask has a problem with SFS?

    I could attempt to test this on my A4000, and move any hardfiles over? But I don't have an High-Density Floppy drive on my A4000 (it died on me long ago) so I can't read my dos disks.
    Steph
  • »24.02.04 - 17:38
    Profile Visit Website
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    Posts: 159 from 2003/10/24
    From: Portland Orego...
    FreeDOS is an implementation of DOS for x86. Not a emulator. You would still need something like Bochs or an x86 to use FreeDOS.
    --Mithalas
  • »24.02.04 - 18:49
    Profile
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Crumb
    Posts: 732 from 2003/2/24
    From: aGaS & CUAZ Al...
    @dholm:

    have you tried QEmu with Wine?
  • »25.02.04 - 09:55
    Profile Visit Website
  • Acolyte of the Butterfly
    Acolyte of the Butterfly
    Posts: 125 from 2003/9/8
    From: Czech Republic
    I cant run cd-rom under Bochs. I have somewhere mistake in config, and I dont know where. Is there any gui or mounter? If yes, where?
    JACK - 3D gfx artist
    Config: Pegasos 2 G3/600 MHz, 256 MB SDRAM (Kingmax), ATI Radeon 9200 Pro 128MB, 120 GB HDD

    My new web: http://jack-3d.wz.cz
  • »25.02.04 - 12:43
    Profile Visit Website
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    dholm
    Posts: 296 from 2003/9/1
    From: Malmo, Sweden
    Actually I couldn't get the CD support to work either. It seemed to just refuse whatever device I configured it to.
    I ended up making an image in Linux and copied it to MorphOS.
  • »25.02.04 - 14:01
    Profile Visit Website
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Spidey
    Posts: 568 from 2003/2/24
    From: Netherlands
    Hi dholm and Jack,

    The CD-ROM works, see my config on the "Hardfile Bochs"-thread. :-)

    @dholm:
    I'm (and I think more people) very interested in your update of Bochs, did you manage to upload it somewhere? :-)

    Bye,

    Spidey

    ps: I'll make a little guide soon to install Bochs.
  • »26.02.04 - 06:00
    Profile Visit Website
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    dholm
    Posts: 296 from 2003/9/1
    From: Malmo, Sweden
    Thanks spidey, I'll check that thread later.

    I haven't uploaded the updated Bochs yet. The problem is that I included the scitech displaydoctor in the archive as it seems that the version that works with current Bochs is hard to find. I'm not sure if it's legal to redistribute that binary so it might not be a good idea to upload the bochs archive to AmiNet. At least not without removing the sdd binary first.
  • »26.02.04 - 06:46
    Profile Visit Website
  • Targhan
    Posts: 2833 from 2003/2/8
    From: USA
    Hey Spidey,

    if you need a place to put that guide, I'm more than willing to host the thing here ;-)
    :idea:Targhan

    MorphOS portal? www.MorphZone.org
  • »26.02.04 - 07:09
    Profile Visit Website
  • Paladin of the Pegasos
    Paladin of the Pegasos
    Jupp3
    Posts: 1193 from 2003/2/24
    From: Helsinki, Finland
    I just recently installed Windows98 on Bochs.

    I meant to make it a LOT faster by upgrading it to Windows 98 lite (that can remove Microsoft Internet Explorer with aid of some Win95 installer files) but the installer had some serious graphical problems.

    BUT I'll try if I can get it installed anyway, and if I can, I sure tell you how.

    I also tried installing latest freedos, but installer crashed always at same point of installation...
  • »26.02.04 - 08:04
    Profile Visit Website
  • Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Spidey
    Posts: 568 from 2003/2/24
    From: Netherlands
    Hi dholm,

    6 hours?
    If my longterm memory still works :-), I installed Win95 in (perhaps) a couple of hours on my Peg I last year.

    I already noticed with my Peg II, the whole system (DOS screen and FDisk) responds a lot quicker than with the Peg I.
    I'll install Win98SE on it and will clock the whole operation :-)

    Bye,

    Spidey
  • »26.02.04 - 11:37
    Profile Visit Website