> I had the impression that the type of 3D support he was providing, is different than
> the type that Mark, aka Bigfoot, Olsen provides for MorphOS. Does anyone else
> recall the differences between the hardware accelerated 3D video card support
> currently available for MorphOS3.9, and that provided by the latest drivers for
> AmigaOS4.1FE, done by Hans de Ruiter? [...] I don't understand fully what the
> differences in hardware accelerated 3D are currently, between MorphOS3.9
> drivers, and the latest video card drivers for AmigaOS4.1FE from Hans de Ruiter?

Warp3D Nova used by OS4 is a more low-level approach than TinyGL used by MorphOS.

> the AmigaOS4.1FE drivers use compositing

The drivers offer compositing. The applications/games on top are using compositing.