Diavolo Backup speed test
  • Paladin of the Pegasos
    Paladin of the Pegasos
    TheMagicM
    Posts: 1218 from 2003/6/17
    We can all right click copy-paste to back up or use mirror copy or try BackMan (then it crashes). So I wanted to try out Diavolo backup since I used that waaayyy back in the day.

    I like nice interfaces, even though mirror copy works great, Diavolo is easy on the eyes. Here are some tests during the backup process. Test bed is a Powerbook G4 15", 1.67ghz, 2gb ram. I'm backing up the SYSTEM: partition to another partition on the same drive for test purposes only.

    Settings in Diavolo for all are "slow/high effeciency (for 25 mhz)" setting, no encryption, just the compression set to 100% and the compression method specified.
    Total size of what I'm backing up is ~ 284mb. While the backup is going on, I'm browsing the web also.

    Format is:
    Compression Method
    Total Compressed size
    Time to back up (Minutes:Seconds)
    Compression %
    Backup throughput
    ==========================================================

    No compression:
    283.7mb
    4:32
    0% compression
    62.59mb/min
    -----------------------
    bzip:
    errors out with XPK-packer error: code -33
    -----------------------
    gzip:
    252.6mb
    4:27
    11%
    56.76mb/min
    -----------------------
    LZM2.100:
    248.7mb
    7:18
    13% compression
    29.85mb/min
    -----------------------
    RLEN:
    279.9mb
    4:57
    2% compression
    56.55mb/min
    -----------------------
    SASC:
    250.2mb
    4:55
    12%
    50.89mb/min
    -----------------------
    SHSC:
    249.4mb
    12:47
    12%
    19.51mb/min
    -----------------------

    EDIT:
    Just for the hell of it, since SASC is the fastest at backup with compression.. I added 139mb to the buffer (no science behind it, I just moved the bar to add that much).

    SASC:
    250.2mb
    4:17
    12%
    58.41mb/min
    -----------------------

    EDIT #2:

    Its faster copying via ethernet to a NAS than it is partition-to-partiton. Wireless is horribly slow btw (its measured in K/min, thats how slow). Its at least 2x as fast backing up via ethernet than partition-to-partition. I'm getting 105-115mb/min via ethernet.

    [ Edited by TheMagicM 06.03.2016 - 09:26 ]
  • »05.03.16 - 14:09
    Profile Visit Website