Order of the Butterfly
Posts: 167 from 2009/11/26
@manga
Quote:
so nope chris i did not downloaded and i dont want
I'm not saying my little program is better than Showgirls, but you really shouldn't say something is better than something else, when you haven't even tried it ! (Sadly it seems this version is broken, so you can't try it anyway...) At the very least it has a *unique* approach for displaying & organising pictures, which I haven't seen anywhere else.
Quote:
if you want my respect for new software, create sumthing we dont have. we need a lot. you should know.
I am most likely to write stuff that I have need of. In this case, even if Showgirls existed for OS4, I would still have written PictureAlbum, because Showgirls doesn't appear to do what I want.
Quote:
who want honest comments to their software. i dont need developers for things i already have.
Then I hope you don't mind an honest comment yourself? Sometimes there is such a thing as being TOO honest. For example, if you go about telling developers that you don't want software that they've *already* spent effort producing, then IMHO you are just going to discourage them from writing/porting more stuff. Another example of too much honesty: Telling people you meet that they are ugly or fat.
Another example of too much honesty *might* be the previous paragraph that I just wrote, since it seems likely to just annoy you... (I can only hope that the benefit outweighs that.)
@Divinity
Quote:
It doesn' t work.
A bit more detail would have been appreciated (like how it doesn't work)... but hopefully TiredofLife gave an accurate description of the problem. It was working better in the previous version, so I will hopefully be able to undo whatever I changed.
[ Edited by ChrisH on 2010/10/6 10:07 ]
[ Edited by ChrisH on 2010/10/6 10:14 ]
[ Edited by ChrisH on 2010/10/6 10:18 ]
Author of the
PortablE programming language.
It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue...