• Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
    boot_wb
    Posts: 874 from 2007/4/9
    From: Kingston upon ...
    Quote:

    freepointer wrote:
    People people, super feedback:

    firstonce for all:
    to boot in the test phase of the CD, set up the network level static (use) let the 0.0.0.0 nevertheless appear. Although then in envarc: sys / net / inetd.conf is the Standard !!! Thus, from START to the confusion of the individual ports, despite booting the CD


    I wouldn't worry too much about the entries in Netstat - these seem to be related to inetd iteslf, rather than the actual operation of any services it manages.

    I have just set up a working (basic) samba installation, and I also get these null ports in netstat.

    Even if I put a silly entry in inetd:

    test1 stream tcp nowait root foo:bar bar
    (and an entry in 'services' to match:
    test1 20057/tcp test1 #user test of 'missing' service)

    This also results in a null port in Netstat when inetd is launched.

    The screenshot here shows everything mentioned above.
    Note that that even with these null entries in Netstat, an smbfs client can still connect using port 139 to a working Samba server using inetd.

    --------------------------------------------

    Reading here suggests it is normal behaviour for netstat to show this information for listening services managed by inetd. This in fact shows that inetd is correctly set up to listen on the ports listed.

    In summary - ignore the strange entries in netstat, they are normal.

    Next step - download netcat from Aminet and use it to check each malfunctioning service individually.

    [ Edited by boot_wb 30.07.2016 - 23:16 ]
    www.hullchimneyservices.co.uk

    UI: Powerbook 5,6 (1.67GHz, 128MB VRam): OS3.1, OSX 10.5.8
    HTPC: Mac Mini G4 (1,5GHz, 64MB VRam): OS3.1 (ZVNC)
    Audiophile: Efika 5200b (SB Audigy): OS3.1 (VNC + Virtual Monitor)

    Windows free since 2011!
  • »30.07.16 - 18:51
    Profile Visit Website