Yokemate of Keyboards
Posts: 4977 from 2009/1/28
From: Delaware, USA
From the "ARM for the future thread"
ASiegel,
Quote:
I am certain it is fair to say that the majority of visitors of this website value quality software much more than raw processing power or hardware feature lists. Since you are a frequent poster, it is surprising to me that you consider Cortex A8-based ARM hardware options to be too slow, yet you buy even slower hardware from manufacturers who spend very few resources on software development and testing and represent opposite values regarding the priority of software and hardware when you compare them with MorphOS.
I suppose the mystery of consumer behaviour continues...
I've been thinking about Andre's comment this morning and there's something that bothers me. I'm not sure how to react to it.
The Windows CE 7 netbook I recently bought was shipped critically crippled with a non-functional wireless connection and a really poor operating system that featured a browser that was essentially useless.
Given these problems, my reaction was to find an alternate OS.
I probably could have found an alternate browser and I could have used the Smartbook with a Cat5 cable or a device similar to the one AmigaDave has mentioned, but I choose not to compromise.
Thinking about this I was forced to realize the parallel that exists with MorphOS 3.0.
While we do have a functional browser and we can use a wired network connection (or use a device like I previously mentioned), when 3.0 is released we won't have wireless (without an external device).
I don't know about all of you, but since I have a Power mac I can live with this. And I look forward to the new features promised in 3.0 (I already have a bootable SATA card ready).
However, if I wanted to use a Powerbook, this would be a serious limitation.
The primary utility of a laptop is its portability.
Sure, this could change with a future release.
But with the choice of using MorphOS 3.0 on a Powerbook or OSX, I'd choose OSX (and that is unfortunate).
I understand that this is a question of functionality and the desire not to offer a feature that does not work correctly (the basic desire to retain the
quality aspect of MorphOS that we've all been able to enjoy).
And I do revel in the fact that a MorphOS device will have more utility and reliability then another Microsoft driven device I recently purchased.
But I can't temper my current disappointment in the decision not to focus on wireless functionality (in 3.0).
And I apologize for any unintended negative tone.
Jim Igou
"Never attribute to malice what can more readily explained by incompetence"