Yokemate of Keyboards
Posts: 4977 from 2009/1/28
From: Delaware, USA
For now, I'm going to give up a bad habit, speculating on or mentioning hardware MorphOS could support.
We already have faster processors then the Pegasos supported.
Once 2.6 is released we will finally have support for G4 powered Mac systems with an expansion bus.
New drivers for the R200 will offer improvements like shader support.
Things are moving along well and I'm sure many of you are as happy as I am about what we'll soon receive.
The leaks about the G5 are exciting, but I can wait. The 7,3 G5 models offer more processing power, but we don't really need that yet. And the G5 won't offer us any real new GPU choices that we can't support with the G4. Yes I know the last G5s supported PCIe, but are those 7,3 models? And even if we support PCIe G5s, the highest performing ATI based video cards (that have BIOS support) use R400 GPUs.
The video cards we're likely to see on the G5 (at least at first) are R300 based (9600-9800).
Without some work around that eliminates the need for an Apple compatible BIOS, our video card options end at the R400. So while everyone is quick to point out that the G5 will give us parity with the CPU power of the X1000, the X1000's support of the R700 series makes parity with their video cards difficult.
And does any of that matter for the near future? Of course not! We currently have the fastest Amiga-like OS running on the faster systems than our competitors.
While other alternative (Amiga-like) system supporters focus on what they don't have yet, I'm going to try to focus on what we've already got. A better performing, AVAILABLE product.
Edit - One quick qualifier - I wholly support those of you who are asking for support for older, slower hardware. Every time someone looks at the cost of entry and compares the Efika (or a used Mac) to anything under AOS (especially the X1000), MorphOS looks like the better alternative.
[ Edited by Jim on 2010/9/1 5:15 ]
[ Edited by Jim on 2010/9/1 5:19 ]
"Never attribute to malice what can more readily explained by incompetence"