> It could be a typo of some sort. The other two Applied Micro > processor families that are supported by Abatron but are missing > in that press release's list are 821xx and 832xx/Gemini. So > "836xx" could mean one of those.
Seems I was right. They corrected "836xx" to "83xxx". And I see now that they made the same mistake 10 months ago already, obviously going unnoticed so far:
