Thanks Andreas,
That clarifies some things that occure to me when I read your posts.

It was obvious that they were most likely just using a frequency boost to obtain the over clock. You don't get an odd gain like 16.7% from a multiplier change. And since the memory clock would be affected by this it seemed likely that initially they changed the ratio that memory was based on to prevent memory instabilities.

Your ability to ferret out all these details continues make make this topic interesting.

One tends to think of Acube boards as rather low tech systems based on relatively slow processors, but the company apparently pushes these parts harder than you would expect for a company building boards intended for both the hobbyist and industrial markets.

[ Edited by Jim on 2011/2/2 17:15 ]