Yokemate of Keyboards
Posts: 12132 from 2003/5/22
From: Germany
>>> From that information, it would appear that Applied Micro hasn't been that
>>> honest about its latest products in development.
>> You refer to PacketPro's clock frequency discrepancy?
> No [...]. What I meant was that it seems as though Applied Micro came to the
> decision to change course awhile ago, but until recently has still been touting Titan.
But that's not what you could have extrapolated "from that information" in my posting you replied to, is it? After all, the "amidst a change in corporate management" statement, which made me wonder, stems from the Linley Group, not from Applied Micro. As far as I can see, Applied Micro never claimed that the switch from Titan core based APM83290 to PPC465 core based PacketPro happened or was decided "amidst a change in corporate management". To me it seems that with spreading misinformation like this the Linley Group is contributing to the confusion created by Applied Micro more than it's helping to resolve it, which makes it even harder to tell fact from fiction.