> I asked Andreas to give you the straight quotes so you could read them

Which I did.

> without him (or me!) telling you what they mean.

You *did* tell what you subsequently are trying to present as their meaning. I quote your own words from your posting I just responded to:

"both of those surrounding paragraphs refer specifically not only to 5121e-based platforms but to non-5121e-based platforms: above to Limebooks (which includes X86 models, remember?) and below to ACube PPC computers."

So when you yourself do that why should I not be allowed to do the same? Double standard?

> instead he wrote you

Wrong, to *you*, Velcro_SP. It's really just you I'm talking to when responding to your postings.

> a short story to explain them

I just proved that you mispresent what you actually wrote in those paragraphs. By commenting them I don't keep anyone from reading them like I quoted them in full (as you wished) and making up their own mind. I think you're underestimating the discernment of others by far.
And why should I quote what you wrote without commenting it when I even linked to it just before? If that doesn't satisfy you then it's up to *you* to quote your own words without commenting them in any way.

> to you.

Wrong, to *you*, Velcro_SP. It's really just you I'm talking to when responding to your postings.

> I disagree with everything he said.

I didn't expect anything else.

> The part where he says I "subsequently tried to misrepresent" is untrue.

I think the part where I say this is nothing but the truth. And I think I proved it.