>>>> I just said that there’s a difference between paying on an incomplete
>>>> contract with your own money versus doing so with someone else‘s
>>>> money without all the money owners‘ explicit consent. Do you think
>>>> pampers sounds paranoid and like a child as well just because he is
>>>> against paying on an incomplete contract with other people‘s money?
>>>> I for one can understand his reasoning.

>>> I'm not even addressing Andreas' response, the insinuation that he
>>> made that my comment was directed at anyone other than him and
>>> Nicholas is beneath him.

>> I made no such insinuations, quite to the contrary. Calling me sounding
>> paranoid and like a child for voicing the same opinion as pampers and
>> being understanding of his reservations to follow your and others‘ advice
>> is below your usual standard.

> As to whether you voice the "same" opinion as Wiktor, perhaps through
> the lens you view circumstances that's correct. The only impression I got
> from Pampers post was that he was uncomfortable continuing to hold on
> to funds for a bounty with an unknown future, after he had decided to leave
> the community.

If that's the only impression you "got from Pampers post", you really should read his comments beyond #27, especially #52, #57 and #59. If these are not saying that he'd feel uncomfortable paying on an incomplete contract with someone else‘s money without all the money owners‘ explicit consent I don't know what would be. And I don't need any lens except my eye lenses for this, neither should you.