Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
Posts: 524 from 2003/11/25
From: Belgrade
Quote:
Zylesea wrote:
MorphOS, as well as AROS, are strong enough for themselves and are better off by avoiding that very burned name as much as possible. The only thing is these systems have their roots in Amiga.
I would welcome it though, if MorphOS and AROS would come a bit closer together, they can benefit from each other.
Would love to see AROS and MOS coming together - especially if that would mean not only more life and development, but m68k and x64 versions too (alongside maintaining PPC32/PPC64). Would buy MOS for e.g. Vamps if backported to m68k and that would be a real advancement, not a minor fix for milking like OS 3.1.4.
Vamp is a bit cornered, since it needs legal OS for standalone sales.
Hyperion mistakes actually leave place for MorphOS to grow.
As an example, if MOS 3.11 gets to support x5000 board and Radeon 7xxx HDs fully,
it would became preffered OS on x5000
------------------------------------------
iMac G5 1GB with MorphOS and MacOS X
Lame PC with AmiKit XE
YT channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdHl_msNWHEVPf229h_gijQ
Telegram Amiga group: https://t.me/amigaranchorelaxo
