>>> The [...] document referenced is highly biased.

>> I don't see any bias in the referenced document, but it doesn't
>> contain anything about any funding by Dickinson either.

> I guess I think of the lack of backing evidence for the charge
> against Trevor as a form of bias

...but on the side of the "Amiga Documents" author, not the author of the referenced document. Maybe the "Amiga Documents" author meant to reference this comment to the referenced document instead, but that's far from worthy as a source document I guess.

> I'm skeptical about the total sums that have claimed to
> have been invested by all parties in the latter day Amiga
> community, it seems inordinately large

At least the sum claimed by Hyperion as of 2013 seems completely plausible to me.