> I think MorphOS is distinctly superior to AmigaOS.
> [...] based on a significantly more powerful ISA.

Version 4 of AmigaOS runs on the same ISA :-)

> AROS64 could become quite attractive as the power of new fpga based
> 68K systems increases.

The Apollo core is advertised as 64-bit core (with 32-bit compatibility), but wouldn't AROS64/m68k (or AROS/m68k-64?) lack compatibility with existing AmigaOS/m68k binaries?

> Cloanto can't develop a new OS based on AmigaOS

I think they are allowed to do this but can't name it "Amiga"-anything.