Paladin of the Pegasos
Posts: 1110 from 2013/5/24
From: Nederland
Quote:Jim wrote:
Quote:geit wrote:
Quote:
XzIt wrote:
was not what i was trying to say though, let's see if this is better.
If 3.10 would be an option, developers would start there version at .2x decimals and not add one later on ;P
that's what i meant. nothing more.
Well, 3.10 is it.
I personally do not deliver any lower 10 revisions beside 0.
I usually go 1.0 followed by 1.10 as many people tend to miss the fact that e.g. 1.1 is not 1.10.
Personally, I have always considered 1.1 to be the equivalent of 1.10 as the need for additional decimal points beyond whole numbers is usually done to indicate minor revisions and their scope.
Numerically, 3.10 is less than 3.9.
So I must admit that I too am confused about following 3.9 with 3.10.
1.01/3.09 vs 1.1/3.9 can make it a bit clearer to those unfamiliar with the Version.Revision(.MinorRevision) string, but it's always been the official Amiga way to do it like the MorphOS Team do it. I've seen the odd exception from third party developers over the years but they aren't common.
[ Edited by Intuition 19.05.2016 - 16:09 ]1.67GHz 15" PowerBook G4, 1GB RAM, 128MB Radeon 9700M Pro, 64GB SSD, MorphOS 3.15
2.7GHz DP G5, 4GB RAM, 512MB Radeon X1950 Pro, 500GB SSHD, MorphOS 3.9
