Yes, best not to count on this one occurring too quickly.
the same people developing it are also still enhancing our current platform.
How much work can you expect them to do?

@ Yasu, how was the after show event? :)

@ASiegel

I was too tired to really enjoy it The choice of location was odd (very far from the fair) but really nice. Good food, good booze and a lot of drunk Amigans. Oh, and Dave Haynie sung some of his greatest hits

[ Edited by Yasu 11.10.2015 - 20:26 ]

> do you've any link where that direction was announced?

Which direction specifically? You mean the API change?

> Things may have changed since but read Itix post #51 :
> http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=34607&forum=28&start=40&viewmode=flat&order=0

Itix doesn't say that current m68k or PPC binaries will run transparently on MorphOS NG, just that they will continue to run in ABox which will run on MorphOS NG. Transparently running would mean that an m68k or PPC program would be able to use a MorphOS NG library and vice versa.
He also doesn't say that the source code of current MorphOS programs will be compilable for MorphOS NG without change.

Quote:

Which would mean it would be boxed.
Not impossible to pass data between both environments, but nothing like transparent.
It would be a nice feature for X64.

Quote:

yes.

Unfortunatly no extra 200MB on the Efika. :)

We demoed Pagestream 5, SoundBankster, DigiBooster, Reader, CSVBase and other upcoming stuff at our booth.

The A4000-PPC was running MorphOS 3.8. It would run 3.10 as well, but we did not update in time and updating on the meeting could have caused unforseen problems. Thats why it stayed at 3.8. No risk to keep the fun :D

I personally saw it for the first time and it is quite nice. I personally would have expected it to be much slower, but it was quite useful.

A release is not planned as it may be a support hell not only due the fragile hardware. Also there is no installation support of any kind yet, so you need to be highly experienced with Classic and MorphOS hard and software to deal with it.

Quote:

Well, you weren´t alone. When walking around a guy, from accent i think he was from italy, stepped back from a booth turning towards me.

He froze eyes on my name tag: "You are geit!" "Yes!" (I would have said more, but my voice was non existing the hole day, so i saved as much words as i could) "From MorphOS Team"
Again I answered with a small "Yes" but smiling. We exchanged a few words and i pointed at our booth, were the real awesome people were. He said he circled our booth several times with some distance not being able to walk anywhere near. I guess he was starstruck as hell.

Until then I did not even cross my mind that anyone could see me that way. But after some rethinking it kind of surprised me that people like piru, itix, cisc I was looking up to in my early amiga days, are the same i am working and talking to every day now, which kind of made me part of it.

Even funnier that a few minutes earlier is was thinking "Wow. I just talked to Chris Hülsbeck!" :D

Quote:

My thoughts were more on the line of:


"Don't get strangeld by Trevordick, don't get used as a seat cushion by bigfoot......."

A new pagestream 5 version?

Quote:

Me drunk ? Never.

Quote:

I'd like to meet you guys as well..only problem is, I'm in the USA.

Quote:

Just general thoughts..

Hmm.. What all would happen then? If we wanted to run legacy stuff, would some sort of built in "UAE" kindy proggy kick in and run the software or we would have to run e-uae or something?

Obviously a rewrite of some sorts for MorphOS. What all would that give MorphOS? Easier access to x86 based software like on Linux or something? Meaning, if they wanted X game or X utility and it exists under Linux, easier to port to x86 MorphOS vs PPC MorphOS?

Anyway, like I've always said, MorphOS Devs just kick ass. Bad ass plan to go x86. I'm sure when the time comes and they release some sort of ideas on what they're thinkin, it'll look even better.

> What all would that give MorphOS? Easier access to x86 based software
> like on Linux or something? Meaning, if they wanted X game or X utility
> and it exists under Linux, easier to port to x86 MorphOS vs PPC MorphOS?

Mostly yes, unless this game or utility also exists for PPC Linux.

Quote:

Aaah.. Andreas... figured you'd reply. Thats a good roadmap for MorphOS.

Quote:

Well, i guess we can say that any port of that kind is years away and i really don´t think we need any PPC or 68K emulation then. In fact with all the 64bit, endian, memprotection involved a full size emulatior would be required to run old stuff, but for what?

Most of the current applications are already available in C source or the developers are still active. So if the classic API compatiblity sails over the cliff most of the stuff will require more or less just a recompile.

If you currently take a look onto your system and count the 68K applications you really need this is more or less nothing and till then it will shrink even further.

Yeah, some old games will fail, but well. Thats live. I don´t see a point in spending tons of human resources in a development which benefits are quite limited. They are better spent in creating a fully featured replacement instead of still sitting on ancient software anyone would love to replace.

This stuff could be added by some third party, like its done on windows with WinUAE, but I do not think any OS developer needs to be involved here.

[ Edited by geit 13.10.2015 - 00:14 ]

what did rj mical actually say when he was shown MorphOS?

Quote:

http://media2.giphy.com/media/HlFDE0DEp9Gq4/giphy.gif

...but in a good way...

> if the classic API compatiblity sails over the cliff most of the stuff will require
> more or less just a recompile.

Doesn't API incompatibility imply source code incompatibility?

> what did rj mical actually say when he was shown MorphOS?

I guess he congratulated the MorphOS team for the progress they made since he was shown MorphOS by Piru 12 years ago :-)

https://morph.zone/modules/news/article_storyid_254.html
http://www.amiga.org/forums/showthread.php?t=44985
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=fi&tl=en&u=http://saku.bbs.fi/lehti/online/44/ajankohtaiset/rjmical.html
http://saku.bbs.fi/yhdistys/tapahtumat/rj/valokuvia.html

I am ready for MorphOS-NG. If that means throwing out backwards compatibility completely, so be it.

I think it is fair to assume 3rd party will get us UAE in a reasonable amount of time. It sounds like UAE may get more robust PPC support in the future. If the MorphOS team soften their stance on emulator usage, the PPC side of compatibility may fall in line by 3rd party too.

Either way, MorphOS-NG is needed. I hope it gets front burner soon. If the MorphOS team need funds, I'd throw into a bounty or a Kickstarter. The development team have the best track record and are the most competent I have seen. What they have done with the resources at hand is impressive.

Quote:



[ Edited by redrumloa 12.10.2015 - 19:18 ]

Quote:
So, no-one replied to tolkien, so, just a little reminder question, is there is native PPC Pagestream version 5.x.x.x been developed / working specifically for MorphOS &/or any other Amiga-like platform?

I took a look at the Page Stream site, and it hasn't been updated since 2011. I hope that answers your question :)

Quote:

Agree...
No sense to keep the backward compatibility further. The amount of usable old stuff is very limited. The memory protection/SMP/more RAM gives more value to MOS, than the execution of old stuff.

Quote:
Yes.

People were able to test it at the Amiga 30 event in Neuss, Germany. MorphOS developer Frank Mariak had spent a considerable amount of time before the show to ensure that it could be shown.

@ASiegel

Awesome! Any etd?

Quote:

No ETD defined afaik (as usual).