Well, there are a lost of differents teams and lot of them are not computer related. One is about beer and I don't think beer can crunch data! ;)

>> what's the point in naming the group amiga if the majority of raw power comes from
>> machines that have nothing to do with it?

> True. Same could be said about Team MorphOS.

Indeed. That's why the more interesting statistics is this:

http://stats.distributed.net/misc/platformlist.php?project_id=28&view=tco

:-)

So we are on 15-th place now, and the next one is in our direct range. Also "SEGA Users Group" does not look like a hard nut to crack in a month or so. Then, there is "Distrubuted Amiga"...

[ Edited by Krashan 02.11.2015 - 08:15 ]

Distributed Amiga is a very difficult target cause they process the same nodes as MorphOS team. We are a bit stronger so let's do It.

No they don't. They do at least 100k gnodes/day less than we do. It'll take a while though to pass them. Alas, we have all the time in the world for that (11% done by far).

At this ratio we should take Norway in 16 days or so. They pretty much let go recently.

Graph from 5 November.

11 November

Sega team seems very strong and they are only two guys! What machine can do ~900.000 nodes a day?
I imagine he has various computers processing data.

[ Editado por tolkien 17.11.2015 - 11:50 ]

29 November

6 December

Graph update: 2 Jan 2016

These are my benchmarks:

Powerbook G4 1.0Ghz 512Kb L2
Fastest core: #1(KOGE 3.1 Hybrid) 12,404,372 nodes/sec

PowerMac G4 1.25Ghz 256Kb L2
Fastest core: #1(KOGE 3.1 Hybrid) 27,397,140 nodes/sec

Powerbook G4 1.5Ghz 512Kb L2
Fastest core: #1(KOGE 3.1 Hybrid) 32,475,718 nodes/sec

Core 2 Quad 6600 2,4Ghz
Fastest core: #3(cj-asm-sse2) 41,785,033 nodes/sec

Why such big difference between 1.0 and 1.25 Ghz G4?
Do they use different processor revisions?

No idea but here you have a few numbers for differents processors to compare.

http://cgi.distributed.net/speed/query.php?cputype=all&arch=2&contest=ogrng&multi=2

www.distributed.net/speed/

The difference from and olg 1.5 g4 and a more recent 2.4 machine is no soooooo big isn't it?


[ Editado por tolkien 03.01.2016 - 21:17 ]

Some of the data don't match, e.g. the 1,0 Ghz model,
there's simply too much performance difference.

¡Truely! not so much difference with my Intel processor,
surprising,
but you have 4 cores running at the same time..;-P
(Maybe Altivec optimizations do the trick)

Your 1,67 G4 is even Quicker than my better G4.
How many nodes/sec are you getting?

Salutations Comrade!



[ Edited by diezi7 03.01.2016 - 22:14 ]

My powerbook g4 1.67 is 35.813.429 nodes/sec. Not so bad I think.

Quote:

Of course, I need one of them ;-D