Quote:

Further RAGEMEM benchmark results of production model:

Code:
Source: http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=32815&forum=14#606210

Addendum:

> CPU: 1150 MHz, bus: 230 MHz, multiplier: 5 (production model)

Seems my assumption on memory bus clock and multiplier was correct:

http://i1103.hizliresim.com/2011/3/26/17.jpg
http://amigaworld.net/modules/news/article.php?storyid=5860#78895

(460 "MHz" in dual data rate mode amounts to 230 "real" MHz).


Edit: Added another link.

[ Edited by Andreas_Wolf on 2011/3/26 13:58 ]

Update:

>> CPU: 1150 MHz, bus: 230 MHz, multiplier: 5 (production model)

> Seems my assumption on memory bus clock and multiplier was correct

Apparently, there're different production model configs out in the wild. Another one reported:

CPU: 1150 MHz, bus: 287.5 MHz, multiplier: 4

http://amigans.net/?function=viewcomments&threadid=210&commentid=3169#3169

This faster config could explain the improvement in RAGEMEM benchmark results observed before.


Edit: Another config reported, almost identical to the first one:

CPU: 1155 MHz, bus: 231 MHz, multiplier: 5

http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=37057&forum=33&start=40#693558
http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=37054&forum=45#693162

[ Edited by Andreas_Wolf 29.12.2012 - 15:12 ]

> Varisys could probably design a killer P5010 board for our market.

Or it could be done by someone else:

"I will be supporting new amiga hardware that will be based on freecale QorIQ 4 and 8 core processor cores and a media box that uses the 55020 64 bit dual core 2 ghz chips. [...] I will be looking for amiga enthusiasts and devs to support my hardware. [...] I have a major commitment from local business and Arrow Electronics and Freescale to support my efforts. I have the design finished and I am waiting for a design engineer to check my diagrams and make up a parts list. I should have prototypes in about 60 days and have some test quantities available by early summer. I plan to go into production by December 2011 in large quantities and already have a contract manufacturer ready to produce all my machines."
http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=33444&forum=34#607096

"I have big plans for AROS on PPC [...] and OorIQ processor family. [...] I would run it on 3041 four core 4080 8 core and 5020 64 bit 2 core processors [...]. The PPC will be high end notebooks and the 64 bit will be a combo computer satellite media and streaming center. I have designs completed have located a manufacturer and am currently having an engineering firm check designs and come up with a parts list. THese are modern computers with very fast processors and the best peripherals a 3 year warranty and training discs included at very competitive prices. I have been working on this for 10 years upgrading it year by year while I raised my children. Now I am ready to go into production."
http://aros-exec.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=54473#forumpost54473

"I have original designs for several models of the new QorIQ 3041, 4 core 4080 8 core and 5020 54 bit 2 core processors in both notebooks and all in one satellite tv DVR/computer combo with 2 hard drives and video audio streaming and 7.1 surround sound and a 24 and 27 inch LCD screen. [...] I am looking to put a team of serious devs together to accomplish these goals. I would like to be in production for December 2011."
http://aros-exec.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=54474#forumpost54474

"I would like to [...] develop new ppc based computers based on the new qoriq based freescale power pc processors [...] as well as a multimedia box based on 5020 64 bit processor. [...] I would like to offer workstations to developers when available. I have finished the design and am going to have a designer familiar with these processors finalize my design and get a parts list so I can produce prototypes and then go into full production by december of 2011."
http://vanilla.slitaz.org/index.php?p=/discussion/2722/

More recent info:
http://aros-exec.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=54470#forumpost54470

Background info:
http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=18183&forum=33&start=140#275922
http://www.amiga.org/forums/showpost.php?p=238893
http://www.amiga.org/forums/showpost.php?p=239155
http://www.amiga.org/forums/showpost.php?p=239163
http://www.amiga.org/forums/showpost.php?p=239679
http://www.amiga.org/forums/showpost.php?p=239681
http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=18841&forum=33&start=120#289815
http://www.na-bc.com/tools/directory.dwp?myfunction=brochure&listing_id=496
http://www.serviceslisted.com/profile/mystical-rose-technologies
http://www.40billion.com/view_resource.asp?resid=972561517
http://www.40billion.com/view_resource.asp?resid=1054620619

[ Edited by Andreas_Wolf 06.10.2011 - 16:55 ]

Update:

> PPC44x chips are not even listed any more on their regular website.

They reappeared in their own proper section: http://www.apm.com/products/legacy/

Update:

Quote:

APM86391 and APM86392 announced ("Diamondback"):

http://investor.apm.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=78121&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1544576
https://myapmold.apm.com/MyAMCC/jsp/public/productDetail/product_detail.jsp?productID=APM86391
https://myapmold.apm.com/MyAMCC/jsp/public/productDetail/product_detail.jsp?productID=APM86392
https://myapmold.apm.com/MyAMCC/retrieveDocument/SNP/APM86391_PB_20110208.pdf
https://myapmold.apm.com/MyAMCC/retrieveDocument/SNP/APM86392_PB_20110208.pdf

It seems that Gopi and Gargus already included those two when talking about their 40nm processors two months ago.


Edit: added some more links
Edit2: changed links from 'myapm' to 'myapmold'

[ Edited by Andreas_Wolf 16.08.2013 - 14:42 ]

Thanks, not quite what we were hoping for, but that fills the gaps.
Up to 1.0 Ghz, three PCIe controllers with a single lane each and one SATA connection.

I don't understand their naming scheme. The APM86290 seems more powerful
Normally, you'd expect these to have lower numeric designations.

> not quite what we were hoping for, but that fills the gaps.

Diamondback's low specs compared to Mamba were to be expected as that's exactly what the roadmap both you and me recently discussed shows. According to that roadmap the next PacketPro chip(s) after Diamondback should be faster than Mamba.

> I don't understand their naming scheme.

Me neither. Just take it as given and don't even dare to conclude specs or performance from the numbers in the name ;-)

> When Applied Micro actually lets someone see some of this mythical silicon,
> then I'll start to place more faith in their press releases.

Footage of a Gemini/APM83290 based board (presumably the Everglades evaluation board):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brJ8SDvhZYg

Wow, its like an M&M commercial. "They do exist!"

That a very cool reference.

Jerry Flake does say "This is the Gemini chip" so there is no confusion as to what he is demoing.

"Sales engineer"? He definitely favors the later part of his title.

I wish the display was a little more active so we could get an idea of how this board functioned.

Update:

> According to IBM* the PPC476FP core even delivers 2.7 DMIPS/MHz.
> That puts it above e500mc (2.5 DMIPS/MHz).
> * PPC476FP Core Product Brief (August 2010, page 2)

Confirmed by other IBM documents:

Introduction to PPC476FP White Paper (April 2011, pages 3 and 7)
PPC46x and PPC47x Feature Differences Application Note (May 2011, page 4)
PPC470S and PPC476FP Technical Overview (February 2011, page 14)

And to my surprise judging by the last linked document it seems like IBM is considering VMX/AltiVec capability for future PPC4xx cores:

"Microarchitecture support for future extensions such as VMX" (page 5)
"internal capped interface for FPU and VMX support" (page 12)


Edit: Just found an older (October 2009) document already mentioning VMX in a PPC4xx context:

"support for future VMX integration with asynchronous issue & execution interface" (page 29)

Edit2: Updated link to point to newer revision document.

[ Edited by Andreas_Wolf 01.06.2011 - 17:14 ]

Update:

> APM86391 and APM86392 announced ("Diamondback"): [...]
> It seems that Gopi and Gargus already included those two when
> talking about their 40nm processors two months ago.

------------------------------
Paramesh Gopi - Applied Micro Circuits Corporation - President and CEO
[...] During fiscal year 2011, Applied Micro introduced eight new products, of which, five were processor SoCs.
------------------------------
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/711065/000119312511126356/dex992.htm (transcript of Applied Micro's fourth quarter 2011 earnings conference call in late April 2011)

If I'm not mistaken fiscal year 2011 has started in October 2010. Since then Applied Micro announced two Mamba SoCs in December 2010 and two Diamondback SoCs in March 2011, which makes four SoCs altogether. Where's the fifth? Did Gopi talk prematurely again like he did last time and #5 will be announced during the next few months? According to the roadmap it should become the fastest PacketPro processor till then. We'll see I guess.

Addendum:

> As of November 2010 there's a fresh roadmap on QorIQ T series:
> http://www.freescale.com/files/training/doc/dwf/AMF_NET_T0425.pdf (page 7)
> T5: T5040, T5020
> T4: T4160, T4120
> T3: T3080, T3060
> T2: T2040

Found an old (Q1/2009) but very interesting document:

http://doc.baidu.com/view/2f22407b1711cc7931b71633.html
(fullscreen version)

pages 3 and 28:
- QorIQ T (Mana): T1020, T2020, T2021, T3040, T4080
- QorIQ X (Toro): X2020

page 20:
- QorIQ P: "e500mc HP 2 GHz"
- QorIQ T: "Mana 64b 1.8 GHz", "NG HPC 3+ GHz"
- QorIQ X: "Toro 64b MT 2.2 GHz"

page 26:
- details on Mana and Toro (two-way SMT)

pages 30 to 41:
- T1020: 2x 1.0 GHz Mana cores, 64-bit, DDR2/3 SDRAM
- T2020: 2x 1.5 GHz Mana cores, 64-bit, DDR3/4 SDRAM
- T2021: 2x 1.8 GHz Mana cores, 64-bit, DDR3/4 SDRAM
- T3040: 4x 1.5 GHz Mana cores, 64-bit, DDR3/4 SDRAM
- T4080: 8x 1.5 GHz Mana cores, 64-bit, DDR3/4 SDRAM
- "Many-core": 16x 1.5 GHz Mana cores, 64-bit, DDR3/4 SDRAM
- T5020: 2x Trivor cores, DDR3/4 SDRAM (probably the "NG HPC 3+ GHz" thing from page 20)

3+ GHz

I love it! well, this gives us some idea of what they're shooting for with the next revision of the e5500 core.
AltiVec and 3Ghz or higher operation.

Great find Andreas.

> 3+ GHz
> [...] this gives us some idea of what they're shooting for with the
> next revision of the e5500 core. [...] 3Ghz or higher operation.

Keep in mind that this clock rate is what more than two years ago they thought they'd be able to deliver the T5 at. This doesn't mean it really will come at that, not even that it's still planned to come at that. After all, 3+ GHz was already on Freescale's roadmap 7 years ago (for the e700 based MPC87xx), and until the P5 gets released at 2+ GHz they're even only sub-2 GHz.

Update:

> New presentation (March 2011), but content same old, same old.

New presentation (May 2011) with new content, finally (page 16):

"Viper Technology expected in CY12"

Acube offers a Sam 460lite now. It is a 1GHz (1017.5 MHz) clocked version of the Sam460 with a slightly faster pci bus. Price w/o HperionOS is 499 EUR + VAT.
http://amigaworld.net/modules/news/article.php?storyid=5940

Complete set is 709.5 EUR - with the German VAT applied that accounts to 844.31 EUR.

> 1017.5 MHz

Weird number. Anybody knows the memory bus clock of this Sam460ex-lite?

> Price w/o HperionOS is 499 EUR + VAT.

I sense piracy to occur ;-)

Seems that price does include AOS4.1

Linky

EDIT: Sorry its 599 with AOS4.1 should read before I post :)

[ Edited by JJ 19.05.2011 - 15:01 ]

"I sense piracy to occur"

I would guess that the "Industrial" purchase price is probably for multiple boards/systems, not just one or two, but I could be wrong.

I guess a group of 10 or more potential buyers could try to save themselves 100 euros and get the Industrial board and then try to pirate AmigaOS4.1, but doubt that it is worth the effort. I don't know what type of piracy protection AmigaOS4.1 uses, since it has been tied to the purchase of hardware, except for the Pegasos2 and now Classic Amiga versions.

[ Edited by amigadave 19.05.2011 - 19:27 ]

Quote:

Being hardcoded and bundled for insanely priced, custom built hardware that almost nobody in the whole world will have access to, except for those few who *already* bought it bundled with OS 4.1.2?

[ Edited by takemehomegrandma 20.05.2011 - 07:56 ]

> AmigaOS4.1 [...] has been tied to the purchase of hardware,
> except for the Pegasos2 and now Classic Amiga versions.

When the Sam440ep was released in October 2007 it still took Hyperion one year for a first OS4.1 version to be released for it:

http://www.acube-systems.biz/index.php?page=news&id=15
http://www.acube-systems.biz/index.php?page=news&id=38

Up until April 2009, i.e. for 1.5 years overall, the Sam440ep (non-"industrial") was available also without OS4.1:

https://morph.zone/modules/newbb_plus/viewtopic.php?topic_id=6490&forum=3&start=11

That's why OS4.1 for Sam440ep(-flex) is still on sale today:

http://amigakit.leamancomputing.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=839

>> I don't know what type of piracy protection AmigaOS4.1 uses

> Being hardcoded and bundled

Your answer doesn't make sense. Hardcoding to the Sam460ex wouldn't prevent a buyer of the Sam460ex-lite "industrial" version (i.e. without OS4.1) to use a pirated copy of OS4.1 for Sam460ex on his machine, would it? Same goes for "bundled" as OS4.1 for Sam460ex is *not* bundled with the Sam460ex-lite "industrial" version. That's the point we were talking about.

> those few who *already* bought it bundled with OS 4.1.2

Again: The Sam460ex-lite "industrial" version is *not* bundled with OS4.1. That's the whole point of the "industrial" version.

Update:

Quote:

APM86791 announced ("Keelback"):

http://investor.apm.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=78121&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1570965
http://www.apm.com/products/embedded/multicore460/apm86791/

It seems that Gopi already included this when talking about their FY2011 SoCs one month ago. But it's apparent that Applied Micro is not really following its own public roadmap as according to this the chip after Diamondback should have been faster than Mamba, yet Keelback is just as slow as Diamondback.

Not bad, but slow.
If APM could get their SoC's to operate at higher frequencies they might have something.