Quote:

Gallium and MorphOs drivers do not intersect at the moment,
but Gallium should be more complete (hardware and openGl features).
IMHO gallium will grow very fast, because there is more than
one person who works on it.

> I'm not sure if Gallium drivers for cards currently
> supported by MorphOS have better performance
> than MorphOS native ones.

Gallium3D is R300+ (and NV30+) only.

Quote:

For the moment.

> For the moment.

You mean there're plans to support GPUs older than R300 or NV30 in Gallium3D?

Quote:

Not older, but newer. I did not say that development of special MorphOs divers for
old chipsets should stop. But for newer graphic cores, MorphOS Devs should think
about, if they can beat gallium in future. It would be much better to work together
with developers of gallium and the red ones, who are already using gallium.

> Not older, but newer.

Then your answer twofoldly doesn't make sense. Gallium3D already supports up to R800 and NV50 right now. That's what I wrote: "R300+" and "NV30+", which means "R300 and newer" and "NV30 and newer".

> for newer graphic cores, MorphOS Devs should think about, if they
> can beat gallium in future. It would be much better to work together
> with developers of gallium

Yes, that's what I proposed to pega-1 5 months ago (German):

http://www.pegasosforum.de/viewtopic.php?p=44947#44947

> and the red ones, who are already using gallium.

I don't think they're using Gallium3D yet.