Quote:
Of course. But you may want to consider the original statement in its full context: "Hyperion Ben Hermans gar nicht mehr gehört, sondern das Management ein anderes ist..."

I am not the one who started to conflate the directors with the owners...

> I am not the one who started to conflate the directors with the owners...

Indeed, that's what Thor did. And there is also another statement by him where he calls Hyperion a two-man outfit and mentions Timothy (De Groote) afterwards (implying Mincea as the second man):

http://www.a1k.org/forum/showpost.php?p=947132

But as I wrote earlier, a CVBA needs at least 3 shareholders. As per your link, the directors are still Hermans, De Groote and Mincea. Confusing, and I wonder what Thor's agenda is with regards to Hyperion and his attempt at making it seem as if Hermans was out of the picture.

Quote:
Not everybody has a hidden agenda. Some people are just mistaken

> Not everybody has a hidden agenda. Some people are just mistaken :-)

Assuming he doesn't have an agenda and he's not just making things up, he must have drawn his conclusion of Hermans not being an Hyperion owner anymore from something. I wonder what this something could be. And we know he has been in at least sporadic contact with Hyperion (P96 licensing, layers.library).

Addendum:

>> That is a little unclear from previous statements made by HyperionMP.

> If we are to believe Hyperionmp, "Ben Hermans & family" are the sole owners
> of Hyperion Entertainment CVBA (and thus De Groote and Mincea its 2 non-owning
> employees). [...] I guess we won't know for sure until someone purchases these
> information from the Belgian company register :-)

cgutjahr over at amigaworld.net claims that Hyperion director De Groote is also co-owner/shareholder the company.

http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=40683&forum=32&start=140#787476


Edit: Statements from an interview with Timothy De Groote over there.

[ Edited by Andreas_Wolf 09.05.2017 - 00:30 ]