I tried now on three different machines... I can't see topics anymore in the forum, only the topics that are the most recent on the mainpage. Did I push on the wrong button or something like that ?

Same issue here

ditto

Should we contact someone for this ? ... Or is it being worked on ?

Hello Oepabakkes,

I noticed you have overclocked your 2x1ghz quicksilver to 1.2ghz.
Can you point me to an article on how to?
Thanks

here it is: http://homepage.mac.com/schrier/pmg4_1000_1200.html

you only have to remove some resistors ...

[ Edited by Oepabakkes on 2010/11/6 18:17 ]

It works again !

Yeah works here now as well in firefox 3.5

Martin

And it is again not working. But here at work I'm forced to use the Internet Exploder 7...

pfff ... again it's gone.

Yesterday I saw that "site under manteinance" warning, after a couple of days with topics not showing up. Today, everything seems fine, but avatar images got lost again, and it seems they can't be uploaded anymore. Pity, but the party rocks again!

Should I say that the site seems to work faster?

Quote:

Whoops! I saee my ugly face again... thumbs up André!

Seems to work fine ... only on the there is a little typo I think ... "Ubmit news item and ubmit new file " ... I am not sure how to "ubmit"

Quote:

This happens when using IE (maybe on other browsers too, haven't checked). Use Firefox ;)

Quote:

Indeed. Those two "submit" lines are, actually, elements of a list with a declared left margin of MINUS TEN pixels. Pretty normal it gets cut on the left side...

Quote:

The cure for all diseases. A little bad design detail in a single web page justifies for installing a full web browser?

@ jcmarcos

Quote:

With standards-compliant web browsers, margins, irregardless of whether they are negative or positive, only affect the *position* of an element, not its size.

So, no, I am afraid it is not "normal" that anything gets cut off.

I rather live with "ubmit" instead of installing another browser... my windowsxp is already a mess enough as it is after all these years and I try to install only things that I use.

Quote:

Hummm... I've said nothing about size. By the way, those negative margins, specifically in lists, are commonly used to avoid its bullet points pushed way too much to the right (a certain, very popular web browser has excesive indentation by default).

But I have to insist, a negative margin, if I'm not mistaken, effectively makes an object's left side dissapear, because it's drawn outside of its container. The same as dragging a window so mucho to the left that a portion of it is out of the screen bounds (something that is optional in MorphOS).

Quote:

Indeed! Most of the people I know that have replaced Internet Explorer have done so because they installed so many crap add-ons into it that it became useless.

Well it's like it is with mobile phones these days... people tend to forget it's main use, is to use it as a phone instead of all the additonal crap you can do with it. Same goes for browsing... I use it to surf the web and not all the other crap. So explorer does that job just fine.

And I am sure all the replacements have their problems also.

@ jcmarcos

Quote:

The wording "cut off", which you used, is a reference to a change in size, usually. It would be challenging to cut something off without affecting the size of an item, wouldn't it? :)


Quote:

I am afraid you are mistaken. CSS margins merely move a container around in relation to other elements.

Of course, there can be scenarios when another element is floating on top, thus providing the appearance that something might be "cut off" because it is hidden behind another layer above. However, the "Submit" link is a child element of the table and there is no use of "z-index", which could be used to move the link below parts of the table by changing the natural element order. In conclusion, parts of it only get cut off because the IE rendering engine is not standards-compliant.

The fact that Gecko-based (Firefox), Webkit-based (Chrome, Safari) and Presto-based (Opera) web browsers all display it correctly should be further proof that the problem is IE.