What makes MorphOS good
  • Paladin of the Pegasos
    Paladin of the Pegasos
    Jupp3
    Posts: 1193 from 2003/2/24
    From: Helsinki, Finland
    Quote:

    Andreas_Wolf wrote:
    >> I think all mainstream operating systems have those as well.

    > Yes, and any OS that doesn't have them, well, would find it harder to use even as "hobby os"

    Indeed. This is one reason more that they should not be listed as pro points for MorphOS compared to the mainstream operating systems.

    Okay okay, I'm sorry for sharing my views :-(
  • »10.05.14 - 14:30
    Profile Visit Website
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    In_Correct
    Posts: 245 from 2012/10/14
    From: DFW, TX, USA
    Common features probably shouldn't be listed as "pros" ... Only the unique features. But the common features should still be mentioned somehow. ... And there should be a simplified version if the goal of this list is to eventually attract new people. There are a lot of idiots in this world, and many will only understand if you say basic terms such as "It can do everything you already do with other OS, except with MorphOS you get less crashing, less computer errors, and less virus scannings."

    ... Yes I know about the flaws with MorphOS. But they can be fixed. Even if they aren't fixed, MorphOS appears to be maintenance free compared to Windows which has reputation to fall apart over time even if armoured with scanners.
    :-) I Support Quark Microkernel. :-D
  • »10.05.14 - 23:39
    Profile Visit Website
  • Yokemate of Keyboards
    Yokemate of Keyboards
    Andreas_Wolf
    Posts: 12161 from 2003/5/22
    From: Germany
    > the common features should still be mentioned somehow.

    Yes, mention them wherever and whenever you like. I just wanted to make clear that those are not what the thread opener has asked for (according to my understanding, that is), so some posts appeared to me like (in part) being based on a misunderstanding of what the original question was.
  • »11.05.14 - 01:27
    Profile
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    realstar
    Posts: 298 from 2003/2/24
    From: Canada
    These are some things that are different and aspects I enjoy about the MorphOS and Amiga style environments in general.

    - Custom Screens and Public Screens -
    I have always liked the concept of using custom screens and public screens that can take over the display and co-exist alongside the desktop. I prefer to having programs like Scribble, ImageFX, TV Paint, Audio Evolution and Dopus 4 on their own screens for instance. It's like creating the perfect environment that the application has full control over instead of having to share some kind of standard desktop environment. It feels like you have escaped the boundries of the standard desktop operating system and gone on to a custom purpose defined space for each game/application to reside in.

    - Menu Bars at top of screen -
    I also really like menu bars at the top of the screen instead of hooked into the application window. I get a kind of twitch muscle memory of locations of menu items and can use a simple gesture to the memorized position without having to find the location where the menu bar will open each time because the window has changed size or position.

    - Very few wizards -
    I do not like flipping through sequential pages confirming each action individually to accomplish a task. Luckily only the first installation has anything similar to this.

    - Snapshot and saving of directory path locations -
    Simple things that mean every time you use the system things are back where you
    want them to be.

    - Configurability -
    MorphOS has more options per capita about letting the user decide how things should look and operate than almost any other OS I can think of and without having to go and modify scripts or recompile stuff.

    - Backwards and Forwards compatibility / Error Tolerance -
    This is something of a lost art on other operating systems where each new release breaks all kinds of software from working correctly. On MorphOS I still use stuff made for Amiga in the 80s and 90s, incredible! Also, often new versions of applications or games will work on much older versions of the operating system as long as it doesn't ask for some specific new component or library versions that didn't exist back then. I can even open a 20 year old library and use it's features in a new piece of software if so desired. I can run applications that run on a 68k cpu even though I have a PPC system. This offers so much dynamic flexibility and compatibility vs other operating systems that are so rigid and demanding of every single resource matching up perfectly with the latest builds. As an example of error tolerant behaviour, If a system resource isn't found in one place it will look in many other likely locations or if a version doesn't match exactly it could still work as long as the API calls are present and perform a similar function. This creates a very error tolerant operating environment that doesn't fail just because something isn't 100% exactly as expected.

    - Automatic hardware recognition -
    This is something MorphOS is very good at. Your sound, graphics, USB devices etc. are found dynamically and correct drivers and devices are used to make them useful.

    - USB -
    I have never seen any operating system offer so much information and settings regarding USB devices plugged into the system. If I plug something into another computer it basically fails or works without giving me hardly any information or a way to attempt to fix this issue in a nice GUI.

    - Save Use Cancel -
    It's a great feature to be able to save a setting, test it temporarily or cancel making any kind of changes when modifying prefs. I often change a setting temporarily and when I reboot it's back to the last saved behaviour without having to go change it back again manually.

    - Icons -
    Very easy to replace change or modify icon images and all information associated with them by several easy methods. It's nice to be able to actually see an icon as a .info file instead of being hidden away. MorphOS makes it very easy to change a PNG image into an icon by just renaming.

    - No hidden stuff -
    Another great feature is the relative lack of hidden or invisible files. Most OS components and settings, icons etc are easy to access and rearrange by simple file management software or even using the desktop itself

    - Shell -
    I do not have to type CD to browse into a directory. It doesn't require case sensitive filenames. I do not have to type full path to something if I already browsed into that directory.

    - System directory structure and filenames -
    I find it much easier to have human readable simple names like C: Devs: Libs: Fonts: etc. to a bunch of obtuse sys/ usr/ root/ bin/ sbin/ proc/ etc/ with hundreds of nested directories stuff to hunt through to find a file or system component

    - User Startup sequence and WB Startup -
    These are about the simplest and easiest way to modify startup behaviour of an OS I can think of. One method uses shell scripting and one method is simple drag and drop.

    - Application locations and installations -
    It's nice to unpack an application/game and copy it wherever you want instead of having a package manager put it into some unknown location and most likely scattering misc files all over a convoluted directory structure that you will never be able to find or remove by hand ever again. This is all about transparency of operation instead of obfusication of simple tasks.

    - Ram Disk -
    I love having a very fast temporary ram disk to work with temporary files that then disappear when I reboot. It's like a scratch/work area that can be erased and reset for reuse over and over again.

    - Window depth arrangement -
    I can leave some windows to the back and move other to the front very easily instead of always having a forced click-to-front that obscurs what I am trying to look at when I click on something else. It's very handy to be able to compare and copy information between multiple open windows without worrying about obscuring one with the other all the time.

    - ASL filerequesters -
    Having a simple movable and resizable vertical list of files and directories seems better to me than some rectangular shaped thing that scrolls horizontally, is often not resizable and may consist of several panes of nested directories. Those usual kind of file requesters will also most likely forget where they were last pointing to every single time they are re-opened within the same application meaning you have to browse through 10 directories again to find the place you were last working in.
  • »22.06.14 - 12:19
    Profile Visit Website
  • Order of the Butterfly
    Order of the Butterfly
    Everblue
    Posts: 167 from 2004/1/6
    PRO

    1. Runs on cheap, old hardware
    2. Boots in an instance, very fast to close
    3. Fun hobbyist OS reminiscent of Amiga Workbench

    CONS

    1. No modern, affordable, off the shelf hardware supported
    2. So certain things (such as browsing) is slow
    3. Seriously lacking on productivity software (and even if it did, it would be too slow by today's standards)
  • »23.06.14 - 08:55
    Profile